If i get mad is it ok to slap a chicken????
That depends on the amplitude of the anger waves that are produced. The wavelength also is an important factor: do not let your \(\lambda\) go too high. Allow your thoughts to have a low wavelength so there is a Rayleigh Scattering just like in the case of light.
You posted this question in mathematics; deal with it ;)
LMAO I LOVE IT!!!!!
Actually it was all physics :'(
Anger waves? Do you have scientific proof of the existence of such "waves"?
And it was incorrect physics as @rajathsbhat mentioned.
still the way you broke it down
@x1xofxaxkndx Are you kidding me? :P Real physicists will use their neither-created-nor-destroyed energy to hit me down with rocks ;)
but why would u ever slap a chicken lol
yeah yeah he's getting a medal for that, @1ofakind
hey hey
anger waves =K* sin(x+phi) phi denotes change of anger with time k is magnitude of anger
lawl
wow
DO NOT LET THE \(\rm A\) go too high in \(\rm A\sin(wt)\).
different textbooks refer to magnitude as A/K ..dont get confused
lol AravindG x)
Assume that \(\alpha\) was the time that Aravind posted his first reply. I essentially did the same thing as the body "Aravind" did at \(A_{\alpha}\). Therefore \(A_{\alpha} = {P}_{\alpha} \) where P stands for the body "Parth".
Nerds. Who doesn't love us?
Actually \(A_{\alpha} = {P_{\alpha + 38}}\)
^ That's spacetime by the way (for those who aren't familiar) :)
Also, because of the the Accelerating Universe theory, I guess that \(P_{\alpha + 38}\) has taken more space than \(A_{\alpha}\).
But the Theory of Relativity again comes in.
So that ^^ has happened relative to the Universe.
@AravindG I was talking about the amplitude, which again matters a lot.
....Man..
@AravindG The amplitude depends upon the magnitude, and vice-versa. We have another case of a virtuous circle.
Wanna talk more about economy? ;)
hmm...bt the wave eqn can be disturbed considering factors like fiffraction and interference...in those cases an additional factor comes knons as 'G ' as seen in my name
*diffraction
Let's get to philosophy: The term “mad” you use, is very ambiguous.
You know...this whole economy and physics stuff..look at the questions again. If I get mad is it ok to slap a chicken? Well...it can also pertain to the topic of animal abuse.. :P
But he posted it in mathematics ;)
Mathematics is associated with the theoretical dimensions.
consider the graph y=mad^2 ..we see that its an incresing function starting from mad=0
i agree with kc
But u see..his question pertains to soo many subjects! It can also pertain to English! Use your punctuation!!
OK, I'd try to get some arithmetic in it. It has been estimated that there are more chickens than there are humans, so it is okay to slap a chicken.
If people kill chickens, why can't you slap it?
the points in the graph where it touches chicken is an occurence of slaps
I don't kill the chicken. I don't eat it!!! Pure Vegetarian.
why is it ok to slap a chicken just because there are more chickens than humans? That's a bad argument
|dw:1356109814936:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!