Question

You guys will argue over anything.

6÷2(1+2)

Answer 1

already argued over this...and consensus was its 6

Answer 2

sorry 9

Answer 3

We are conversing, aren't we?

Answer 4

It's 9. Next question.

Answer 5

I disagree that it's 9.

Answer 6

Why is it 9 and not 13?

Answer 7

Abb0t, demonstrate your calculations.

Answer 8

P
E
MD
AS
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
Left to right!
MD
6/2=3
3(3)=9

My answer is 9

Answer 9

\[\int\limits_{0}^{L/2}dx_1\int\limits_{0}^{L/2} dx_2|\Psi(x_1, x_2)|^2=\int\limits_{0}^{L/2}dx_1\int\limits_{0}^{L/2}dx_2|\Psi_1^2(x_1)\Psi_2^2(x_2)-\Psi_1(x_1)\Psi_1(x_2)\Psi_2(x_1)|\]
Which is
\[I_1I_2-I_{12}^2\]
Where:
\[I_1= \int\limits \Psi_1^2(x)dx= \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \]
and
\[I_2= \int\limits \Psi_2^2(x)dx=\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \]
and \[I_{1,2} = \int\limits\limits \Psi_1(x) \Psi_2(x)dx = \pm \frac{ \sqrt{51} }{ 2 }i\]
Resulting in 13

Answer 10

Demonstrate your calculation @Compassionate

Answer 11

WOAHH....@abb0t
what did you bring in?!! I dont see any squiggles in the main problem!!

Answer 12

pemdas is correct. It should be 9 though :)
happy holidays all!

Answer 13

I said it was 9!! Happy that I am right!

Answer 14

Ouch I have a headache... What in the world did you type @abb0t It's like in swahili...

Answer 15

Hahahah I couldn't even understand it.

Answer 16

Looks like stuff from Quantum Mechanics, at least that's the only time I ever saw Psi used like that... Although I don't know much about the subject. :p

Answer 17

Particle in a box :)

Answer 18

eh?

Answer 19

it could also be 1, if you distributed.... :)

Answer 20

Haha. My initial thought was 1, but I 4got about PEMDAS.

Answer 21

\[6÷2(1+2)=3(3)=9\]

Answer 22

@Hero so you are saying you hate math

Answer 23

9

Answer 24

can we really directly assume that its not 2*3 together there? with that, it comes to be 1 :/

Answer 25

i see..didnt know that..hmm..

Answer 26

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2806ky0Wz1qc9lhz.gif

Answer 27

^ Lol. Didn't click.

Answer 28

Nothing risque or of that sort ;)

Answer 29

It seems you've convinced me to click your nonsensical link.

Answer 30

holy crap look at all these people viewing this...

Answer 31

they both suck

Answer 32

Indeed. http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/well_done_sir.gif

Answer 33

We are conversing, aren't me?

Answer 34

Yes, yes me am.

Answer 35

The answer is 6. Deal with it.

Answer 36

http://25.media.tumblr.com/2d2705971bf7e09042b01801324eef91/tumblr_mfngbsaGs61rgw59ro1_500.gif Its 9

Answer 37

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gGxLlnvQbaw/Tv4JvavQdKI/AAAAAAAAA6c/WshTxyn1dJk/s1600/yes_it_is.jpg

Answer 38

My gifs went to sleep. In other words, too lazy to argue.

Answer 39

In others words, you lose.

Answer 40

9

Answer 41

6

Answer 42

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%C3%B72(1%2B2)&t=crmtb01&f=rc

Answer 43

Wolfram is obviously wrong.

Answer 44

@Compassionate i'm having trouble understanding what your trying to achieve by being difficult...were you not loved as a child?

Answer 45

^ Oh yeah. http://media.tumblr.com/9a8c5f5eb3110712142fc0956932008b/tumblr_inline_mfgxjv2UhX1rnwch7.gif

Answer 46

So...to conclude: if a person asks this or writes this down, he has to formulate it better! Use another set of brackets.

Answer 47

I was molested by a reindeer. Don't bring up the bad memories.

It's 6.

Answer 48

^ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mf3rydieE61rbmcbo.gif

Answer 49

^

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Got_47e91d_1571513.jpg

Answer 50

I kinda didn't like compassionate, but now I actually don't mind him cause he's actually fairly mediocre at trollin'.

Answer 51

Prove that it's 9.

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/166/212/DO%20IT%20owletGOT%202.jpg

Answer 52

Yeah, trolling isn't really trolling when it's transparent

Answer 53

Unless I'm also trollin'.

Answer 54

ITT: Trolls trolling trolls who were originally meant to be trolled by trolls.

Answer 55

d'ah!

Answer 56

Zzzzz

Answer 57

Cary on my wayward son.

Answer 58

http://media.tumblr.com/aead2aa43a748ed4d1ed60f9eb7549a6/tumblr_inline_mfjeupVtMI1r9naon.gif I hope there are no children here.

Answer 59

http://pukeon.us/resources/Dolan%20wallpapers%20fak%20u%201.png

Answer 60

the "sqiggles" are integrals :)
i don't even know what he did...
some math magic
wala!

Answer 61

http://media.tumblr.com/80b547f875515df74cc4992744807e86/tumblr_inline_mfes61dkhj1rxa4z0.gif

Answer 62

Rage.

Answer 63

@karatechopper
the "sqiggles" are integrals :)
i don't even know what he did...
some math magic
wala!

Answer 64

Ohyes

Answer 65

I know they are integrals. but i like to call them squiggles

Answer 66

haha oh sowwy
but i really don't know what he did.
i would say....
BS!!!!

Answer 67

We can call them squishies.

Answer 68

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_me84e8cxP31ra7hn8o1_500.gif

Answer 69

squiggles!!!

Answer 70

\[\int\limits_{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{}^{}}^{\int\limits_{}^{}}}^{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{}^{}}^{\int\limits_{}^{}}}}^{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{}^{}}^{\int\limits_{}^{}}}^{\int\limits_{\int\limits_{}^{}}^{\int\limits_{}^{}}}} \]

Answer 71

all this is is a poorly defined statement, but the convention is to go from left to right with MD

Answer 72

Refer to the following with regard to operator precedence:

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_precedence

6÷2(1+2) -> (6÷2)*(1+2) -> (3)*(1+2) ->3+6 -> 9