Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Genetic engineering can be used to create more productive strains of farm animals. By adding genes to an animal’s DNA, the animal can be made to produce milk or meat containing vital nutrients that would not be found naturally in those products. This provides a greater amount of nutrients per serving of milk or meat. Do you think that this type of genetic engineering should be pursued? Explain your answer. What are some possible impacts (positive and negative) of this type of genetic engineering on individuals, society, and the environment? Please help me, if you can.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok is this biology

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I need help

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok what schoole do you go to

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops school

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its online school

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can you answer the question? /:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

check your inbox sent you a message

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok give me a feww minutes if I can get find the answer I will give it to you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, thank you!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

does this help Positive : - Society : better/cheaper mean to get the vital nutriment. - Individuals : Healthier - Environement : ? Not really affected in any positive way. Negative : -Society : ? - Individuals : DNA manipulation carries a risk (eg, it goes wrong, and the milk end up being poisoned) -Environement : As everybody use the 'new' cow, the old variety of cow begin to disappear, causing a loss of genetic diversity, which ultimately reduce the species overall survival odds. (Natural selection favors diversity)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

also heres this 1. It should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. There are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but I can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless. 2. Yes. First, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. The pros involve better medical treatment. The cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. Looking at DNA markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. And OK, actually I suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Last is this tell me if it helps Positive impacts would be that this creates an easy way to produce large quantities of certain medicines (e.g. insuline) or vitamins, or other supplements (e.g. calcium) and make them easily available and consumable for patients. Negative impacts would be that it is not sure if the production of these un-natural compounds is harmful for the animal, or if it would impact quality, taste, or toxicity of the meat/milk.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got the answer, Thank you..:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

was it in one of my answers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks for the medal

OpenStudy (anonymous):

fan me so when ever you need help send me the question and I will try to find you the answer

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!