Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

can someone please help me in solving this theorem: if an integral domain D is of finite characteristic then its characteristic is a prime no. prove it

OpenStudy (experimentx):

*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is this???

OpenStudy (experimentx):

bookmark

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Relishing the abstract algebra :D

OpenStudy (experimentx):

those sora question came in my exam ... i couldn't do it.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I'm thinking...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can u help me please in solving it???

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I will, as soon as I can figure it out :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is from Ring theory....

OpenStudy (experimentx):

currently I am eating ... looks like there's something in proofwiki http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Characteristic_of_Integral_Domain

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Aww... a spoiler alert? :P

OpenStudy (experimentx):

don't worry ... i won't understand it, i had trouble dealing with simple group theory.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no in ur link finite characteristic condition is not given

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Ok... I got it :)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

By your will @rosy At your signal, I proceed :)

OpenStudy (experimentx):

looks like she went offline ... post if you like ... even if i don't understand.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, let the characteristic be k, and let the unity = 1. The unity exists, as this is an Integral Domain. Then... k 1 = 0, by definition. Suppose k = mn, where m and n are less than k (in other words, k is not prime) then mn1 = 0 m1n1=0 (1+1+1...)(1+1+1....)=0 m times^ n times^ This is a contradiction, as we have an integral domain, which is not supposed to have zero divisors. Hence, it can't have been the case that k = mn, where m and n are less than k In other words, k must have been prime QED

OpenStudy (anonymous):

are u sure in an integral domain unity always exists.......bcz in the def of integrl dmin ,which i study,existence of unity is not mentioned..

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes, the existence of unity is assumed in an Integral Domain.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok thanks a lot.....u have solved a major problem of mine....:)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!