Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which of the following was evidence to support Vanzetti's innocence during the Braintree robbery and double murder trial? No witness claimed to see Vanzetti during the shooting. Witnesses placed Vanzetti elsewhere during the crime. Vanzetti feared for his safety and that of his friends. Vanzetti's gun had not been used in the shooting.

OpenStudy (ashleyisakitty):

The police took Sacco and Vanzetti into custody primarily on the basis of two pieces of evidence. Sacco owned a pistol of the type used in the murders, and the men were arrested at a garage attempting to reclaim a repaired automobile that had been seen in the vicinity of the South Braintree crime scene. Sacco and Vanzetti knew very little English and gave confusing and false answers during their interrogation, which diminished their credibility. Sacco and Vanzetti were indicted on September 11, 1920, for the murders and the Robbery. The trial began on May 31, 1921, before Judge Webster Thayer. The defendants were represented by Fred Moore, who had been hired on their behalf by the recently formed American Civil Liberties Union. Eyewitness testimony at the trial was contradictory. A few witnesses gave detailed descriptions of Sacco and Vanzetti, but on cross-examination many of the details proved inaccurate. Several defense witnesses testified that Sacco had been in Boston at the time of the murders.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so its b?

OpenStudy (ashleyisakitty):

I believe so!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank you :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can you help me with this? What was one effect of the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924? The Ku Klux Klan was revived. The Red Scare quietly came to an end. Immigration from eastern and southern Europe all but stopped. Refugees from nations devastated by the Great War came to America in large numbers. i think it may be c but im not sure

OpenStudy (ashleyisakitty):

You're correct! It stopped immigration.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok thank you again. haha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

CORRECTION ! Question: Which of the following was evidence to support Vanzetti's innocence during the Braintree robbery and double murder trial? Correct Answer: A. No witness claimed to see Vanzetti during the shooting.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Many witnesses supported his claim that he was somewhere else at the time of that robbery. But most of them were Italians who did not speak English well.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im taking the test right now and that was from my lesson

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A. is the correct answer B was wrong just took test

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!