show that q /(x^2-2) is not isomorphic to q /(x^2-3)
q here being the set of rational numbers?
yes
Q[x] /(x^2-2) , Q[x] /(x^2-3), the congruence classes
Also, did you note that \[\huge \frac{\mathbb Q}{<x^2-2>}\cong\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt2)\]?
Yes
oh and Q(sqr(3) is isomorphic to Q / x^2 - 3
And, also, \[\huge \frac{\mathbb{Q}}{<x^2-3>}\cong\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3)\]yes.
so i have all the pieces, i just dont know how to finish the puzzle
Well, here's one way to do it, suppose that there is an isomorphism from Q(sqrt2) to Q(sqrt3)
Let that isomorphism be \[\huge \Phi:\mathbb Q(\sqrt2) \ \rightarrow \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt3)\]
So, what's \[\large \Phi(1)\]?
Unity must be mapped to unity, right?
yes
But I do not understand what \[\Phi(1) is\]
It's just the image of 1, under the isomorphism, phi. If you don't like phi, we can use f instead. f(1) = 1 right?
yes
So, by extension, the image of any integer must be itself, since, for any integer n, f(n) = f(1+1+1...+1) = f(1) + f(1) + f(1) ... + f(1) = 1+1+1+...+1 = n
I follow so far.
So, the image of any integer is itself, what does that make the image of any rational number?
itself?
Remember, since it's a field isomorphism, \[\huge f\left(\frac{m}n\right)=\frac{f(m)}{f(n)}\]
but sqrt of 2 and 3 arent rational?
We'll get to those. So, we're clear that the image of any rational number must be itself, okay? :)
haha yes
Okay, so, what must be \[\huge f(\sqrt2)\]?
Relax, we don't know :) But whatever it is, it must not be rational. Right?
Yes
so... \[\huge f(\sqrt2)=a+b\sqrt3\]where a and b are rational, and b is not equal to zero.
Because Qsqrt 2 is iso to Qsqrt3
based on our supposition
Not that, yet, but only the fact that f maps Q(sqrt2) to Q(sqrt3)
oh okay
So, based on this, what now is \[\huge f(\sqrt2^2)=f(2)\]?
We know that since 2 is rational, its image must also be 2, right?
yes
And since this is an isomorphism, it is also equal to \[\huge (a+b\sqrt3)^2=a^2+2ab\sqrt3+3b^2\]
Yup
So, \[\huge 2=a^2+2ab\sqrt3+3b^2 \]see anything wrong yet?
The left side is obviously rational, so it forces the right side to also be rational. So, 2ab must be 0, or ab must be zero.
but didnt we say b wasn't zero?
That's right, so a must be zero :)
And so, \[\huge 2=3b^2\]
b = sqrt of 2/3
which is not rational. Contradiction, anyone? :)
haha yes! because f(2) forces the other side to be rational?
Yes. So, satisfied? ^.^
Because assuming that Q(sqrt2) is isomorphic to Q(sqrt3) leads us to sqrt(2/3) is rational, a contradiction.
Make your presence felt, @urbanderivative :)
I was just reading
I get it now, thanks for all your help!
Okay, that's all I need to know :) I need to go now, thanks for the nice question ^.^ ---------------------------------------------- Terence out
I like to keep you sharp
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!