Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Suppose that L(y)= ...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[L \left[ y \right] = (x ^{2}+1)y \prime \prime-2xy \prime+2y = (x ^{2}+1)^{2}\] and \[y _{1}= x ^{2}+1\],\[y _{2} = x\] are solutions of L[y] = 0. Find the general solution of \[L \left[ y \right] = (x^{2}+1)^{2}\] on the interval .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

interval \[\left| x \right|<1\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

is L a Laplace transform?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

then youll have to define it for me. The only other time Ive seen it would be as a linear operator then

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, that would be it.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

hmmm, so it looks like y = y1 + y2 + y3 + ... is what it is refereing to

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

variation of parameters?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

quite possibly, using a wronskian perhaps?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i know the long version, and the short version ....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that too.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the short version involve the theorem?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lol, i never recall thrms. The wronskian is a determinant of derivatives i beleve

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

let me know the short version for now.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\begin{vmatrix}W_x&W&W_y\\ y_1&0&y_2\\ y'_1&g(x)&y'_2\\ \end{vmatrix}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

this actually ends up being the cramer rule for a solution of 2 equation in 2 unknowns if we do the long version

OpenStudy (amistre64):

do you know how to run a determinant on this matrix setup?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the ones i have dealt with only are 2 by 2, so not really.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

this setup takes advantage of submatrixes to find Wx cover the row/column of the Wx and take the determinant of whats left: -y2 * g(x) to find Wy cover the row/column of the Wy and take the determinant of whats left: y'1 * g(x) to find W cover the row/column of the W and take the determinant of whats left: y1 y'2 - y2 y'1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it tends to be more intuitive if taken the long way first .... but im a little slow :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i would disagree.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

with the 2nd phrase.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i would like to be as slow as you are hehe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

could you go step by step with me. i think im really slow.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im trying to recall the rest of the setup using the wronskian i know its something to do with Wx/W and so forth

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, its pretty tedious stuff.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please dont hesistate to bring in other people. Thank you very much!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isnt the Wonskian this way \[ W(t)=\left[\begin{matrix}x^2+1&x\\2x&1 \end{matrix}\right] \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was thinking about that..

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the smarter than mes tend to come in and peek about :) \[ \begin{vmatrix}W_x&W&W_y\\ x^2+1&0&x\\ 2x&(x^2+1)^2&1\\ \end{vmatrix}\] \[W_x=-x(x^2+1)^2\\ W = (x^2+1)-2x^2\\ W_y=(x^2+1)^3 \] \[\frac{W_x}{W}=\frac{-x(x^2+1)^2}{1-x^2}=\frac{-x(x^2+1)^2}{-(x^2-1)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

I do a setup that allows me to just run all the Ws at a glance

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thats the Cramer's Rule for solution of set of equations?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[A'x+B'y=0\\A'x+B'y=g(x)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you guys are too smart for me haha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got the Qronksian down, what next?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wronskian*

OpenStudy (amistre64):

wow! a new method, the Qronskian :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hahaha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@qrious126 this explains the same. you want to check out http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph116C/Wronskian_12.pdf

OpenStudy (anonymous):

math is the only language that advances "for" science based on old math. Other languages develop for no reasons!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hahah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you know you can learn so much if you dont proscrastinate almost every time you're given an assignment.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the long version is ..... yp = A(x) y1 + B(x) y2 y'p = A(x) y'1 + B(x) y'2 + A'(x) y1 + B'(x) y2 ; let A'(x) y1 + B'(x) y2 = 0 for the homogenous part, giving us: y'p = A(x) y'1 + B(x) y'2 y''p = A(x) y''1 + B(x) y''2 + A'(x) y'1 + B'(x) y'2 inserting the yps into the original equation gives us A(x) y''1 (x^2+1) + B(x) y''2 (x^2+1) + A'(x) y'1 (x^2+1) + B'(x) y'2 (x^2+1) -2x A(x) y'1 - 2x B(x) y'2 +2 A(x) y1 + 2 B(x) y2 ---------------------- (x^2+1)^2 which should give us 2 equations in A' and B' to solve

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks! appreciate your help!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@amistre64 what did I do to deserve a medal?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

you helped me out with that link you posted :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@amistre64 hmm. thanks. and welcome ^_^

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!