Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table. Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not? (p ∧ ~q) and ~(p ∨ q) p q ~q p∧ ~q p∨ q ~(p∨ q) (p ∧ ~q) ↔ ~(p∨ q) T T F F T F T T F T T T F F F F T F F T F

Question

Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table.  Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not?      (p ∧ ~q) and ~(p ∨ q)      p q ~q p∧ ~q p∨ q ~(p∨ q) (p ∧ ~q) ↔ ~(p∨ q) T T F F T F T T F T T T F F       F F T F F T F

anonymous · Answer

sorry about the format....

Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table. 
Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not? 
  (p ∧ ~q) and ~(p ∨ q) 
  
p        q          ~q           p∧ ~q          p∨ q        ~(p∨ q)       (p ∧ ~q) ↔ ~(p∨ q)
T        T           F             F                  T              F                T                        
T        F           T             T                  T             F                 F                                           
_________________________________________________________________________________
F        F            T             F                  F             T                 F

dan815 · Answer

can u draw what u mean by this statement (p ∧ ~q) and ~(p ∨ q)

dan815 · Answer

|dw:1365290475124:dw|

anonymous · Answer

I literally have no clue.. I've never actually done this before..?

anonymous · Answer

Can you please explain the first part? I mostly understand the second part now. 
:)

dan815 · Answer

i dont know what its asking either what is this|dw:1365290649481:dw|