find an antiderivative of...
\[\frac{ x^2 }{ 4-x2 }\]
@terenzreignz is it not take int of the whole?
lol why ask me? :D
I'm still thinking. ;)
I think if we set it under the terminology of int to get the antiderivative, it is clearer to follow and it is easier.
Might as well brandish the big guns... @ParthKohli don't just stand there, do something :P
I'm not a big gun. Let me still try...
Well... that was interesting.
\[\dfrac{x^2}{4 - x^2} = \dfrac{x^2}{(2 + x)(2 - x)}\]\[= \dfrac{x}{2+x} \times \dfrac{x }{2 -x}\]I wonder if that helps.
How about we use longhand division first? If not, then a trig substitution might work. However I think a longhand division is imperative in this case of the integral, because even if we want to work with partial fraction decomposition later, we want to make sure that the grade of the denominator is higher than the grade of the numerator.
Got it!
x^2:(-x^2+4)=-1+(4/(-x^2+4)) if I didn't make any careless mistakes, now for the second term you can use pfd as shown by @ParthKohli above, split up the denominator into (2+x)(2-x)
I think I solved \[\int\limits_{}^{}x^{2}/4-x^{2} \rightarrow x*x/4-x^{2} \rightarrow u=x , dV=x/4-x^{2}\] \[V=-1/2\ln(4-x^{2}) , dx=1\] I think with twice use of part int we can salve this
edit: V=-1/2*ln(4-x^{2})
try \(x=tanh(u)\)
hyperbolic sub. might be easier.
trigonometric substitution it just seems too good to be true \[\large \int\frac{x^2}{4-x^2}dx\] Let \(x=2\sin(\theta)\) \(dx = 2\cos(\theta)d\theta\) \[\int \frac{(2\sin(\theta))^2}{4-(2\sin(\theta))^2}(2\cos(\theta)d\theta)\]\[\int\frac{4\sin^2(\theta)}{4(1-\sin^2(\theta))}(2\cos(\theta)d\theta)\]\[2\int \frac{\sin^2(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}d\theta\]\[2\int\sec(\theta)\tan(\theta)d\theta\]\[2\sec(\theta)+C\]
I am sure hyperbolic sub might work, but I'd still recommend to use long hand division and partial fraction decomposition you will end up with: \[\frac{ x^2 }{ -x^2+4 }=-1+\frac{ 1 }{ 2-x }+\frac{ 1 }{ 2+x }\]
easy integral isn't it?
wolf doesnt agree with your answer terrence :P but long division by hand is tedious. in my opinion; hack it with hyperbolic sub.
I must have made a mistake somewhere... then
but remember, that's not the final answer yet, that's still in terms of theta.
and again, emphasising - I must have made a mistake somewhere... if there is one
yeh it would require back substitution, seems elegant too to solve it that way.
@ksw19372 did you study hyperbolic functions already? If yes, it might be the easiest way to approach.
he/she should have; since its a calculus class. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_function
not yet :(
i am stuck with the partial fraction part..
many people have hyperbolic functions later, I myself did cover them much later than the regular trig functions. In the end it's a matter of taste which way you want to go, I do believe that they all have their advantages/disadvantages. For partial fraction decomposition you should end up with something like that: 4=A(2+x)+B(2-x) So if you set x=2 you can read immediately that A=1 do the analog for x=-2
but where is the -1 from?
longhand division x^2:(-x^2+4)=-1 + (4/(-x^2+4))
got the final ANSWER! THANK YOU ALL!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!