Question

help

Answer 1

help please

Answer 2

either a or c im guessing

Answer 3

i thought so

Answer 4

i thought a

Answer 5

I'd lean towards (A) myself, too. (C) is generally frowned on in the press. You can make a headline or story creative, but resorting to sensationalism raises too many red flags that can lead to trouble for the journalist and the publication. It's a really fine line.

Answer 6

Thanks can you help me with more ?

Answer 7

I'll do my best! :)

Answer 8

I'm thinking (B) because it's a question pointed right at the event in question. The other questions seem more interested in relating the history of other events.

Answer 9

Probably the first question, (A). The other questions seem loaded with bias. The last one will probably net you a simple answer than anything as thoughtful as to why a candidate decided to back out of their campaign.

Answer 10

I'd probably go with (C).

Interviewing someone and maintaining control of the conversation are important, but you should also let the other person feel free to talk about their answers without being forced to stick too closely to a script. By sticking only to your questions, or making the interviewee uncomfortable, you might miss out on valuable insights that might otherwise have been shared.

Answer 11

help please?

Answer 12

I'd go with (A) myself. It doesn't matter if you have the most "expensive" clothes at an interview and you should always look for more than one interview source. Preparation is always important.

Answer 13

help please

Answer 14

Probably (C), to allow an editor or proofreader to send digital comments next to the changes.

Answer 15

strict tone?