Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 41 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

A photography shop owner displays two sizes of photo in his shop. Each photo A requires 720cm of display space and each Photo B requires 360cm of display space. The available display space cannot exceed 108,000cm . The shop owner buys each photo A for €6 and each photo B for €8. He does not need to spend more than €1200. (i) Taking x as the number of photo A and y as the number of photo B, write down two inequalities in x and y and illustrate these on graph paper. (8 marks)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(ii) During a promotion the selling price of photo A is €12 and of photo B is €10. Assuming that the shop owner can

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I think (i) asks for the constraints?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ending of the second question that got cropped out ", How many of each type should he display in order to maximise his income? (4 marks)"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And I'm not quite sure still what finding the constraints means

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

What limits your linear program

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, the available display space cannot exceed 108000... so...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So 720x + 360y = 108,000

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes, actually.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or simplified as 2x + y < 300

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No, wait... more like \[\huge 720x+360y \le108000\\ \\ \huge 2x+y\le300\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

As for the other one..."He does not need to spend more than 1200"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm still clueless as to how I'm going to finish this and write it on a graph, let alone do the second one

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Just graph them as lines first... 2x + y = 300 and the other one, which I'm certain you're already got.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Pretty sure I'm suffering from my usual dose of the overcomplicating the whole thing, the 2x means that the slope will move down 1 x for every 2 "Y"s right?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yeah, seems like it :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Still haven't figured out the second one :p

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, that's the problem, isn't it? :D Now, If you have graphed your two inequalities, at which point did they intersect? ^(honest question, I don't know, myself, so you have to tell me :) )

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm currently mult-tasking my studying by also doing quadratic functions at the same time so I haven't graphed this just quite yet xD

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

take your time :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Just so we're clear, I pick an arbitrary point between 0 - 150 and graph it like that, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1367211332556:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Something like that?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Arbitrary points? I don't really know how you were taught to graph lines, but just graph them and solve for their point of intersection... and yeah, I guess it looks something like that...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mainly self taught with little formal education in between.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so where do they intersect?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't know, I am ill-equipped with the knowledge of how to solve this.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay... at least give me the two lines that we're looking at (you've already given one of them) 2x + y = 300 what's the other one?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

3x + 4y = 600

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, we have 2x + y = 300 3x + 4y = 600 Let's look at the first equation... 2x + y = 300 Try to solve for y (in terms of x)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y = - 2x + 300

OpenStudy (anonymous):

?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Sorry... Now, using this value for y, replace y in the OTHER equation with this expression in terms of x.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y = - 0.75x + 150

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No... In the first one, you got \[y =\color{red}{ -2x-300}\] what I want you to do is substitute this expression for y for the y in the OTHER equation. \[3x + 4\color{red}y=600\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So 3x + 4(-2x - 300) = 600?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes. and now, solve for x.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

3x - 8x - 1200 = 600 -5x = - 600 x = - 120?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

= 600*

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So.... x = ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

X = - 360

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I suggest you do this again, from the beginning... and pay close attention to each step. 3x + 4(-2x - 300) = 600

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Wait a minute, I made a typo O.o Anyway... \[\Large y = -2x \color{red}+300\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah, so I was right when I made a blunder :p

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

It tends to happen. Now, let's do this more seriously, and without error, this time. Substitute, and solve for x, you get?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

3x - 8x + 1200 = 600 3x - 8x = 600 - 1200 -5x = -600 x = 120

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, good. Now substitute this value for x into any one of the two equations you started with, and solve for y.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2(120) + y = 300 240 + y = 300 y = 60

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Good. Now, in the case of these maximization problems, the optimal (maximum) solution would lie in one of the corners of your enclosed region. Obviously, (0 , 0) would be a corner of your enclosed region, but it isn't the maximum value. What are the other 3 corners?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(0 , 60) (120, 0) (120, 60) ?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

(0,60) and (120,0) are wrong... but you got the right idea... zero out one of the variables and max out the other... Remember your two inequalities? \[2x+y \le 300\\ 3x+4y\le 600\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, if we let x be zero, what results in the two inequalities for y?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y <= 300 y <= 150

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Good. Now, pick the "less picky" of these two inequalities. What I mean is pick the one which, if satisfied, would also satisfy the other inequality.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

300

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

...is a number, not an inequality.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y <= 300

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay... is it true that if y <= 300 then automatically, y <=150 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well 150 is less than 300 so it would 150 would be an inequality within 300.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or am I viewing this completely wrong.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes or no. If y <= 300 does that already imply that y <= 150 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Really? What about 200? 200 <= 300 but 200 <= 150 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah right, I was thinking more in terms of what would cover the most of the inequality.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No. You pick the inequality that would satisfy the other.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, one of the corners, since we let x = 0 is (0 , 150) Now find the other one, by letting y = 0 instead.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

\[2x+y \le 300\\ 3x+4y\le 600\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

150 < 300 200 < 300

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Blergh

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x < 150 x < 200

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, so which one of these do you choose?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x < 150 as it satisfies both itself and x < 200

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Good. So your other corner point is...?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(0,0) ( 120, 60) ( 0, 150) (150 , 0)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Good. Now remember the function we were trying to maximize? The one where picture A sells for 12 and picture B sells for 10? Assuming all can be sold, what is the profit function \[\Large f(x,y) = ?\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[f(12, 10) = ?\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

What?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

If the seller sells x units of picture A and y units of picture B How much does the seller make?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x + y = z

OpenStudy (anonymous):

12x + 10y > 1200?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I'm not asking for an inequality, I'm asking for the function... f(x,y) = ?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

The function that which we are trying to maximize. (the profit function)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Stuck? f(x,y) = 12x + 10y

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah, I found myself wrapped in economic research notes looking for tthe profit function.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Don't overcomplicate things... this isn't a profit function, strictly speaking, in terms of economics, this is actually a revenue function... ANYWAY Now, all you have to do is test out your four corner points, see which one gives you the biggest value.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

...for f(x,y)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I gotta rush, but Ive got it, I've rached the part of the textbook that looks simple.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!