A scatter plot contains a trend line with a slope of -1/10. Does this trend line illustrate a correlation?
A. Yes, there is a positive correlation. B. Yes, there is a negative correlation. C. No, there is no correlation. D. There is not enough information.
is that all you're given? or are you given the correlation coefficient as well?
thats all thats given
ok well ideally you would have the correlation coefficient (or the data values to find the correlation coefficient) because this will help you determine how strong the linear correlation is
but because this critical piece of info is missing, it's hard to say how strong the correlation is which leads me to think it's either B or D if the correlation is strong enough, then you'll have a negative correlation however, we don't have enough info (as I said above), which is why D could be an answer as well
see what I'm saying?
yea
If I were answering this, I guess I would lean more towards D since that missing piece of info is very critical However, they could have easily implied that the correlation coefficient is assumed to be -0.5 or smaller, not sure though
A scatter plot contains the points (-3, 7) and (-1, 2). Does this scatter plot illustrate a correlation? would this be a negative correlation?
it only contains those points? and nothing else?
yes
ok luckily all you have to do is find the slope of the line through those two points
using the slope formula m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
(-3^2 - 7^1) / (-1^2 - 2^1)=5.3^_ ? @jim_thompson5910
i should have stated that the 2's and 1's aren't exponents
they're just ways to label the two sets of x and y values (so you can tell them apart)
oh ok
slope through (-3, 7) and (-1, 2) m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) m = (2 - 7)/(-1 - (-3)) m = (2 - 7)/(-1 + 3) m = ???
-2.5
you got a negative slope (which is correct), so you have a negative correlation it's actually a perfect negative correlation because there are only two points on this scatter plot
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!