Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table.
Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not?

(~p ∧ q) and (~p ∨ q)

Question

Part 1: Fill in the missing row of the truth table. 
Part 2: Are the two statements logically equivalent? Why or why not? 
  
(~p ∧ q) and (~p ∨ q)

anonymous · Answer

attachment

anonymous · Answer

please help me understand this

anonymous · Answer

OK, you're supposed to test each of these statements with all possible conditions. So far we have both true, both false, p true q false, and ____. ~ means "not", ^ means and, v means or.

anonymous · Answer

um I still don't get it tho. how do we tell if it's gonna be true or false? @numb3rl

anonymous · Answer

You put in all possibilities in the p and q columns, then describe what it does to the two statements.

anonymous · Answer

Possibilities of what? i see examples here in my course but why is there 4 columns of tftf?

anonymous · Answer

OK, the first column lists possibilities for p. It can be true or false. The second lists possibilities for q. It can also be true or false. Right now, out of the four possibilities, only three are represented. The fourth is the missing row.