Ask your own question, for FREE!
Calculus1 16 Online
OpenStudy (christos):

So I have this problem to solve:http://screencast.com/t/yAgmcoQP There is no inflection point but... http://screencast.com/t/ShRELGKpQG I don't know what that is or how can I find it for myself?

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

check for f'(x) and f"(x) any attempt ?

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

There's no inflection point, i'm about to post this in your other question.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

If the answer key shows it has one, then the answer key is wrong. A parabola can't have an inflection point - the concavity never changes (it's always either concave up, or concave down).

OpenStudy (christos):

so this answer is wrong? http://screencast.com/t/ShRELGKpQG

hartnn (hartnn):

-4-2x=0 -2x=4 x=-2 even if F is the anti-derivative of f, the critical point of F would be x=-2

hartnn (hartnn):

**inflection point

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yep. It was probably meant to be a cubic or quartic or something. f'' of a parabola is always a positive or negative number... \[\Large f(x) = ax^2+bx+c\] \[\Large f'(x) = 2ax+b\] \[\Large f''(x) = 2a\] Which is a constant.

OpenStudy (christos):

in the problem it says "And find the x-coordinates of ALL inflection points"

OpenStudy (christos):

Maybe thats a hint of some sort?

hartnn (hartnn):

well, as our agent said, there is no inflection point for f

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Don't stress about it Christos, the problem or the answer key is wrong :) There's no inflection points.

OpenStudy (christos):

I see:( thank you a;; for the help

OpenStudy (christos):

all*

hartnn (hartnn):

you find inflection point by equating 2nd derivative to 0....was this discussed?

OpenStudy (christos):

yea yea

hartnn (hartnn):

ok, just confirming...

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

lol don't make a sad face @Christos! Don't worry about it. Either the answer key was for a different question, or the question has the wrong functions written in, or some combination of a cluster-f--- of mistakes. It's reading too much into it to think that maybe they were really asking for the antiderivative F or something... that's just trying to interpret info in the question that isn't there. It clearly states f. As is, the problem is just broken :)

OpenStudy (christos):

yeah :D

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

That's better :D

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!