\[10, 15, 22, 33, 47, ?,\]
5 7 11 14 2 4 3 2 -1 3 that aint it
hmm,
@amistre64 , logic, please
i was trying a difference level to see if at some point there was a constant row .... but theres not enough numbers to be sure
got what you mean
.......................... 60 ; would be fine, but does not necessarily mean 5 7 11 14 13 its correct :) 2 4 3 -1 2 -1 -4 -3 -3
60 is not the answer i am looking for,
we can create a polynomial that hits all those values .... but then thats not neccesarily a "correct" method either .... some context would be helpful
maybe a picture
is it 67?
close
oh.
68 ....
but why?
Is it correct? I ensure, I am not making any guess :)
y = -x^4/8+13x^3/12-11x^2/8+65x/12+10 ironically enough, that get (5,60) too :)
so what comes next ?
ok, next one: 10 12 15 18 22 27 33 39 47 56 68 ?
82
oops or is it 91?
what is the pattern?
They follow the same pattern of every multiple of ten. E-6 : [there will be 6 values for each multiple of 10, for E-6 : 20% tolerance ] 10, 15, 22, 33, 47, 68, then it continues 100, 150, 220, 330, 470, 680, 1000 etc. right?
The E-12 series will have 10% tolerance 10,12,15,18,22,27,33,39,47,56,68, 82(I think its 82) then it continues
its practical electronics ..
But what is this pattern they are following, ? How does the % number determine the next term in the sequence?
Well with the help of the % , the error is calculated, right?
i guess so, i would like to know the details though
Please refer to the pm. And I will come back after a short sleep and will try to explain it clearly. I have also forgotten something about this topic, I studied it 1.5 years ago, may be I need some source to refresh my knowledge. I will prefer books though.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!