Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

if y=tan(x+pi),find x as a function of y.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y=tan(x+pi), y belongs to real. tan(x+pi)=tanx. thus, tanx=y \[x=\tan^{-1} y\]

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

you can not actually do inverse on both sides unless you are given the domain of the function

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, usually, if nothing is given we take the standard doman and the range. and y takes all the values, then there is nothing wrong in taking the inverse, since it is a bijective one in its domain.

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

how about tan^-1 (y) = x+pi ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

since, tan^-1 (y) is restricted to open -pi/2 to open pi/2, x= tan^-1(y)-pi, doesn't fit the domain of x. we assume x to be in (-pi/2,pi/2) right? hence, we need to adjust the equation in order to satisfy the characteristics of the function(especially the inverse one). it happens only when we neglect the -pi from tan^-1(y). to satisfy the equation. hence it is only tan^(-1)=x.

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

how can you assume x to be in (-pi/2 , pi/2) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we cannot, but since the asker has not mention anything about x, we can assume it to be within -pi/2 to pi/2. the main aim is to know what a inverse is, and it is done.

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

i'd disagree here, we can not assume it to be (-pi/2 , pi/2) why not assume it to be (-3pi/2 , -pi/2) so that now we can directly take inverse

OpenStudy (anonymous):

there's no harm in it. you can do it. but then you are going out of the standard domain. tanx is also bijective in (-3pi/2, -pi/2). you are allowed to do that. but it would be more preferable if it is done in its standard domain. that's why i assumed x to be that way

OpenStudy (shubhamsrg):

hmm

OpenStudy (jhannybean):

@oldrin.bataku in here!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we need to know restrictions on \(x\) as the inverse is only a function after a specific branch cut

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the asker has not mentioned any. tan(x) is always invertible in any \[(\frac{ (2n-1) \pi }{ 2 }, \frac{ (2n+1) \pi }{ 2 })\] where n belongs to an integer. thus, it's inverse exists in any of that period.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!