Solve the homogeneous differential equation 2x dx + (y-3x)dy = 0
@Loser66
Have you done these yet? Bạn đã làm những chưa?
roi
hahahaha.... interesting. !!!
does that mean no? lol i don't speak vietnamese i just have a translator
yes! I did
how can you put it there?
copy and paste from translate.google.com
you are...but interesting
so how do you solve @Loser66 there's two approaches to homogenous de's and how do you know if it is homogeneous? vậy làm thế nào để bạn giải quyết @ Loser66 có hai phương pháp tiếp cận đồng nhất de và làm thế nào để bạn biết nếu nó là đồng nhất?
hahahaah... I know how to consider whether it's exact or not, friend. there are 2 ways to solve.separate or substitute y =Vx
am I right?
yes you substitute y=vx... the way to tell is a bit hard to explain, but i'll try
so say the equation is of the form M(x,y)dx + N(x,y)dy If you rewrite the equation as M(xt,yt)dx + N(xt,yt)dy and the same factor of t factors out of the equation, then its homogenous... does that make sense?
So M(xt,yt) = 2xt = t(2x) and N(xt,yt) = yt -3xt = t(y-3t) both factor out a t so its homogenous...
I have a way to figure out the solution: let see.
2xy -3x^2 =C, it's mine
I got something way different
ok, that's the trick. let ,me redo, heheheh
i didn't check if that works, (i hate the calculus of checking it in this form heh)
2x dx +(y - 3x) dy = 0 let y = ux . So dy = u dx + x du and use substitution. 2x dx + (ux - 3x) ( u dx + x du) = 0 2 dx + (u - 3)(u dx + x du) = 0 2 dx + u^2 dx + ux du - 3u dx - 3x du = 0 (u^2 -3u +2)dx = ((3x -ux) du (u-2)((u-1)dx = x (3 - u) du now separate the variables. dx/x = (3-u) / (u-2) (u -1) du the left hand side is ln x + C. The right hand side will require partial fractions. It will be of the form A/ (u-2) + B/ (u-1). Solving for A and B you will get A = 1 and B = -2 . So integrating the right hand side means integrating 1/(u-2) + -2/(u-1). We obtain ln(u-2) -2ln(u-1). We now have: lnx + C = ln(u-2) -2ln(u-1) Substitute back in that u = y/x (from the beginning substitution) We now have: lnx + C = ln((y-2x)/x) -2ln((y-x)/x) Apply log properties: lnx + C = ln(y-2x) - ln x -2ln(y-x) + 2ln x C = ln(y-2x) -2ln(y-x)
\[\frac{ y^2-2xy+x^2 }{ y-2x }=C\] is the answer but i was looking to see if you did it differently @loser66
@rrr same answer as mine, except you need to raise both sides to e to cancel the logs
our answers are reciprocals of each other though, hrmm
to me, I check whether it is exact or not. yours is not. then find \[\mu\] to make it exact. by formula. base on that differential equation which has exact solution find int respect to y of M and int respect to x of N. pick like term add them together to get the solution.
It is OK that they are reciprocals since they would equal an arbitrary constant. The constants that they equal are not the same constant. They are also reciprocals.
Let me make sure I understand your question. You want to know what on your particular solution, you have a t in one solution and not in the other. when you are making it look like your RHS of the nonhomogeneos DE.
this is another one
When you find your from of particular solution when you working with the method of undetermined coefficient, your form is determined not only by the RHS of your DE but also by the complementary solution of the DE.
oh yes, I got what you mean, because the solution from the LHS has the form of e^-t already, so, the nonhomogeneous part must be At^-t , right? On example 1, the LHS doesn't have the form of e^2t so no need to have t at the RHS, right?
Yes, you have it.
the last one, please, please, please!!
Gotta go put my kids to bed. Sorry.
what's the question?
at my attachment above
\[y"-3y'-4y=-8e^tcos(t)\] this?
yes.
so we need the particular solution
cos (2t)
\[\huge y"-3y'-4y=-8e^tcos(2t)\]
ok got it, give me a sec ok?
sure. I am waiting
been just a bit since i've done nonhomogenous 2nd order equations, and there's a bunch of different ways to do this
I need just one. give me it, please,
\[y_p=e^t(Acos(2t)+Bcos(2t)\] is what you used yes?
lol except the second is sin(2t)
I copied from my prof
yes, you are wrong there. but no big deal
ok so you know that the right hand side is going to be of that form
eliminate one constant in the front of e^t , right?
then?
yes we need a constant infront to... ok now we need to find the first and second derivatives and plug this all in to the ODE
which is not easy, can make mistakes
\[e^t(Acos2t+Bsin2t)=De^{(1+2i)t}\] right? from Euler's formula for complex number, right?
yes you can do that too
Oooookk, I got it now, thanks a ton .
ok :)
hey, you did something on justin.tv for fun?
Did i see something for fun? there's all kinds of things on justin.tv
oh no my channel on justin.tv isn't just for fun, its part of my business
what are you doing there?
hang on a second, i'm helping someone else
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!