I have to use Wronskian to find out the particular solution of ODE, but I cannot get the answer, please help y"-5y'+6y=2e^t
I got y_1 =e^2t; y_2 =e^3t, and Wronskian is e^5s then ???
plug all of them into the formula, never get the right answer which is e^t. Please, help
one more question: when calculate Wronskian, if I let e^3t first then e^2t, the W(s) = -e^5s. which is different when I let e^2t the e^3t , the W(s) = e^5s. Why??
Swapping columns of a matrix changes the sign of the determinant; this makes intuitive sense if you look at it as an "oriented" volume of the parallelipid spanned by its columns in regular linear algebra
Oh, yah, so we should be "flexible" in choosing y_1 y_2 to get the W(s) positive, right?
right; sign is arbitrary and depends on which you call the "first" solution
can someone show me, please
\[ y_p= - y_1\int \frac{y_2 e^{2t}}{e^{5t}}dt+ y_2\int \frac{y_1 e^{2t}}{e^{5t}}dt \]
yes
there is 2 in numerator since g(s) = 2e^t
the solution in book and in Wolframalpha is e^t. :( !! I didn't get it.
Oh Sorry, I read \[ g(t) = e^{2t}\]
Let me fix that
\[ y_p= - e^{2t}\int \frac{e^{3t} 2 e^{t}}{e^{5t}}dt+ e^{3t}\int \frac{e^{2t} 2 e^{t}}{e^{5t}}dt=\\ -e^{2t}\int2 e^{-t} dt+e^{3t}\int2 e^{-2t}dt=2 e^{t}- e^{t}=e^{t}\\ \]
so, we don't have to plug any arbitrary limits to the integral to find it out? Anyway, thanks a ton... I am stuck with it for 8 hours.
No, that is the correct way of doing it. Enjoy.
my prof asked us do something like |dw:1374323418325:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!