Here is a histogram displaying the top 30 lifetime batting averages in baseball history. This distribution of data shows lots of lifetime averages in the middle classes, but tails off sharply at both the upper and lower ends. What best explains the fact that there are very few averages in the lowest class? A. Histograms always have taller bars in the middle. B. The histogram is symmetrical. C. There may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30. D. Batting averages lie on a bell-shaped curve. E. Very few batters are skillful enough... read further
.. enough to have the very highest batting averages.
?
I think it may be the last one. A is possible, but I don't think it's ALWAYS the case.
no A doesn't really make sense
nvm
?
I got the answer, so its alright
was it E?
no it wasn't
D?
The answer is C for sure, to those who still don't have the answer.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!