The figure below shows a rectangle ABCD having diagonals AC and DB. Anastasia wrote the following proof to show that the diagonals of rectangle ABCD are congruent. Anastasia’s proof Statement 1: In right triangle ADC, the sum of the squares of sides AD and DC is equal to the square of hypotenuse AC so that AD2 + DC2 = AC2 and in right triangle ABD, the sum of the square of sides AD and AB is equal to the square of hypotenuse DB so that AD2 + AB2 = DB2 (by symmetric property of equality) Statement 2: AB = DC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 3: AC2 = DB2
statement 3:AC2=DB2(from statements 1 and 2) statement 4:AC=DB (taking square root on both sides of AC^2=DB^2) Which statement in Anastatia's proof has an error? a)statement 1 b)statement 3 c)statement 2 d)statement 4
@phi
@phi
|dw:1375110679944:dw|
@amistre64
@amistre64
statement 1 is so complicated it is hard to say... the other 3 statements appear correct
so a would be my answer?
@phi
In right triangle ADC, the sum of the squares of sides AD and DC is equal to the square of hypotenuse AC so that AD2 + DC2 = AC2 in right triangle ABD, the sum of the square of sides AD and AB is equal to the square of hypotenuse DB so that AD2 + AB2 = DB2 (by symmetric property of equality) Symmetric Property of Equality: if a=b, then b=a ***************************** i dont see how the writeup conforms to the property they describe
so the answer is A? @amistre64
geometric proofs are not my strong point .... but from what i can tell; the property they are trying to apply does not fit what they have written.
my best guess is that A is off, but i cant be sure of it
thank you @amistre64
good luck :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!