Question

A group of scientists have proposed a new theory about biological evolution. The new theory would be reliable if

other scientists prove the results non-testable
other scientists repeat and match the results
it is not supported by lengthy data and observation
it is accepted as a universal law of nature

@texaschic101

Answer 1

It should be B right? @texaschic101

Answer 2

@germanphysics

Answer 3

I would go with B

Answer 4

Yeah thanks!!


The laws surrounding the motion of planets in our solar system

can be replaced by new laws
describe what happens in nature under certain conditions
prove that theories on space are non-testable
can be used to prove that theories on gravity are non-observable
how about this

Answer 5

Do you get it?

Answer 6

I would go with B

Answer 7

Can't it be A too?

Answer 8

I do not think so....but I am not 100% sure.....you could gt a 2nd opinion if you want to....this is not my best subject....I prefer math and History

Answer 9

Thanks what about this one cuz I am not doing math or history .
The process by which weak nuclear forces in carbon-14 isotopes transform a neutron into a proton while releasing an electron is called

alpha decay
beta decay
relative dating
absolute dating

Answer 10

Do you think it is B?

Answer 11

Thats what I thought but not sure

Answer 12

correct...beta decay

Answer 13

I hope you don't mind, but I am gonna go to the math section for awhile

Answer 14

Thank you a lot for your help! Its okay you can go bye my friend

Answer 15

talk to you later friend

Answer 16

bye! :)