Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

How do you solve for vertical asymptote? Like, I know you set the denominator to 0, but after that I'm confused. the function is f(x) = (3x+1)/(2x)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2x=0 x=0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There is a vertical asymptote at x=0

hartnn (hartnn):

so, x=0 is a line, the y-axis which is the vertical asymptote to your function f(x)

OpenStudy (jdoe0001):

2x = 0 => x = 0 those are just the vertical asymptotes though

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's what I was thinking

hartnn (hartnn):

then, you are thinking correct :) any more doubts ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well. All you have to do is look at the denominator, right?

hartnn (hartnn):

and to set it to 0, yes, right.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Unless you can factor the top EX. (x^2-9)/x-3 Then it looks like there is a vertical asymptote at x=3, but in reality, it's only a hole at x=3 because you can factor the top and simplify it to cancel the x-3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So what would you do then??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(x^2-9)/x-3 [(x+3)(x-3)]/x-3 (x+3) the x-3 cancels out on the numerator and the denominator, but since the original function had x-3 on the denominator, there is a hole there

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So it is discontinuous?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yup!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

at that point

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohh h :o

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!