How do you use the law of detachment to draw a conclusion in a conditional statement?
check out this page http://hotmath.com/hotmath_help/topics/law-of-detachment.html
kk
ok what if the question is this: If n is a prime number greater then 2, then n squared is an odd number. 9 squared is an odd number. what would be the conclusion?
you can't use the law of detachment here
if you changed "9 squared is an odd number" to something like "7 is a prime number", then it would work and your conclusion would be "7 squared is an odd number"
so its not possible.
no it's not, it's a very specific form
is the law of syllogism the other way around? like if q then p?
the law of syllogism is if p then q if q then r therefore if p then r
so it's like a chain of events
one link of the chain causes a ripple in another
OOOH ok so if the statement is: If an animal is a red wolf, then its sciemtific name is Canis rufus. If an animal is named canis rufus it is endangered. Conclusion: The red wolf is endangered?
correct
YAY!! i think im actually getting this thanks again
that's great, yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!