Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

can anyone solve this y"-(2/x)y'+(1+2/(x^2))y=xe^x

OpenStudy (amistre64):

seems doable ...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im thinking series ....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no series

OpenStudy (amistre64):

why not?

OpenStudy (abb0t):

You can use laplace transform.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

might as well be asking: can any one open this door? sure. um, but without using your hands? ....

OpenStudy (abb0t):

LOL!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u see u have two hands use the other one

OpenStudy (amistre64):

without using any methods known to man ... solve it :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

laplace requires intial conditions i believe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u mean the only method is using series?

OpenStudy (abb0t):

avril lavigne, aren't you a singer? Why are you taking differential equaitons?

OpenStudy (abb0t):

You can use reduction of order to reduce them to constant coefficients if i remember correctly.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

variation of parameters ... a wronskian .... stuff like that maybe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I myself think it must be some kind of substitution! looks like one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

to use wronskian I need at least one solution

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[let~y=\sum_0c_n~x^n\] :) thats a substitution

OpenStudy (abb0t):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/ReductionofOrder.aspx that's the method i was talking about. reducing it to constant coeff. but there is another method that you don't need to reduce them to constant coeff, but instead a similar method to using annihilators. But i have to go, hope this helps!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

you can develop one solution from the homogenous and then work it into the wronskian ... by chance

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's not a substitution! thats an answer u gave! I don't know how?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do u mean by chance?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

took diff eq three years ago, don't remember much, bump for review

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i mean that if you can solve the homogenous then you have one of the solutions to apply for the wronskian; but that rests on the ability to determine the homogenous solution to start with

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well that is the primary problem! the rest is pretty simple

OpenStudy (anonymous):

reducing to constant coefficient must be the solution but for that I need a good substitution.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You could find the auxiliary equation of the left hand side, then use it to find a general solution (ie complementary function) Then find a particular solution to rhs and add them together

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well u can't find an exact solution to the right handside without solving \[y_{g}\] sarahusher

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u know any general substitutions for reducing

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!