Please help me
If you want help--I can help you (I worked out the problem last night...).
As long as you treat me with respect.
Of course.
And only if you admit that I'm your only hope.
Just kidding.... You don't have to say that!
._.
Okay, so one of the constraints is (30,40). Right?
I mean vertices.
@jim_thompson5910
@piglet9
First, there's something I totally missed at first.
do you have a better picture of this problem?
no..
You'll still have to draw a picture but check it out: The problem's even easier than it looks because spruce trees: a.) are cheaper b.) take up less land c.) take care of more CO2 So really, you would just want to buy all spruce and no maple...
well, they want to plant both kinds of trees. That is what the problem says.
No, you can CHOOSE either type of tree but their objective is to "maximize carbon dioxide absorption"
Wait, piglet has the spruce trees costing $60 (they should only cost $30)
ok I got the wrong solution lol
30x+40y <=2100 600x+900y<=4500
doh! i forgot a 0 on that 4500
grrr
That was a nice graph, though. I don't know how to add graphs to my answers...
you go to draw to add a graph
Oh, I didn't know that did straight lines... (Actually, I kind of hate it when people try to write words with the "Draw" but that's just me...)
what next?
Ok, you know how when you graph inequalities and you shade one side of the line?
this is all i have so far 30x+40y <=2100 600x+900y<=4500
The FEASIBLE REGION is sort of just like that--you shade the part under both constraints but only the part in quadrant 1 that's underneath both constraints.
what do I do after the part I have down? how do I graph that?
ok lets start over... 30s + 40m <= 2100 600s +900m <= 45000 simplified to graph: m<= -3/4s +52.5 m<= -2/3s +50 and my semi-bad handwritten graph:
How do you change colors in the "draw" part?
I don't think you can change colours
|dw:1383010986504:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!