Can anyone help me out with logarithms? I have a benchmark coming up and am so not ready! Thanks!
What do you need help with?
I can figure out the simple things, but usually when it gets to a natural logarithm or possibly graphing, im hopeless
A natural log is just \(log_e\), that is, the log base e. It's kind of a strange base to try to grasp intuitively but it works the same as every other log if you understand the basic concept. You can solve equations like \(2^n = 256\), right?
Yea, I can do that. n=8
correct?
Yes. :) So a natural log is just what you'd use to solve something like\[e^n = x\] It's just \(n = \ln x\) (If you already get this part, then we can move on. I'm not totally sure what part you're having trouble with yet)
What youre saying is making sense
Can i just list off what he said would be on the benchmark that is confusing me?
Ok
-Use properties of log to expand/condense -solve exponential equations that require logs -graph a function with given information -compositions to prove if two things are inverse
Well, we did the second thing already. :D
oh yea, haha
If you know the properties of exponents, then all you have to do is remember \(\log_x x^n = n\) and you can think of the properties of logs. For example, \(\log xy = \log x + \log y\). You know this because \(x^a \times x^b = x^{a + b}\) which also means that \(\log_x (x^ax^b) = \log_x x^{a + b} = a + b\)
i remember him saying that, along with \[\log{x} -\log{y} =\log{\frac{ x }{ y }} \]
Right, that's another one! Directly connected to the fact that \(\frac{x^a}{x^b} = x^{a-b}\)
ok, i took notes on the properties (i just found them xD) now i know how to graph an exponential function but not a log
I think all you really have to do to graph a log is to plot points at the nice round values and then draw a curve between them. At least that's all I know how to do. :D
ehhh wouldnt there only be one value tho? haha
What do you mean?
doesn't a log only have one value? SO how could you plot two?
I'm talking about graphing a function like \(y = \log x\)
yea, for an exponential, the two points would be (0,1) and (1,A), A being the base
For a log it'd work the other way. I mean, this is basically what a log means. So for \(y = log_{10} x\) you could plot a point at (1, 0) like always, then one at (10, 1), and one at (100, 2), and (1000, 3) and so on. I hope you have a lot of graph paper... :P
Haha proooobably not xD, so a log graph looks no different then an exponential one?
Here's what the graph of the (base 10) log looks like. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=graph+y+%3D+log_10+x You can ignore the orange line if you don't care about imaginary numbers, which you probably don't right now.
So it is different
I feel like such an idiot right now
But related. Remember the definition of log. Saying \(y = \log_a x\) is the same as saying \(x = a^y\)
That's why (1, B) is on the exponential graph and (B, 1) is on the log graph. (Where B is the base)
but the shouldnt the graph for \[y=\log_{} x\] have points for (0,1) and (1,10)?
No. In the case of (1, 10), x = 1 and y = 10. And \(\log 1 \ne 10\).
Oh, I just saw your other reply
I might have to call this meeting adjourned, Im not much of a studious person xD
Remember, \(y = \log_a x\) is the same as \(x = a^y\), so if you can do exponentials, just do it backwards.
Alright, makes sense :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!