Jessie just finished the probation period at work and got a $0.50 per hour raise and 4 more hours of work per week. Jessie's friend scoffed, “That's only $2 more per week! Who cares?” Why is Jessie's friend wrong about the change in Jessie's weekly pay? What more do we need to know about Jessie's work situation to calculate the actual change in the pay? How is this related to the product rule in calculus class?
Jessie's friend isn't very good at math is he?
You're in calculus?
Apparently not. And yes.
This seems incongruous. An algebra question teamed up with one on calculus. What the biggest mistake that the friend is making?
The friend isn't taking into account how much Jessie is getting paid in the first place, right? This is the first written problem I have been given in this class so I'm a little confused.
A warm Welcome to OpenStudy. I can help guide you through this useful site. You can ask your questions to me or you can message me. Please use the chat for off topic questions. Remember to give the person who helped you a medal by clicking on "Best Answer". We follow a code of conduct, ( http://openstudy.com/code-of-conduct ). Please take a moment to read it.
@goformit100 We're chatting about the subject. This is Open STUDY isn't it. Isn't that how you study with other people?
@kmchargue Right. He only took into account the raise she recieved.
So the new pay per week would be written as xy+0.5x+4y+2 and the increase as 0.5x+4y+2 but how would you write in words how it relates to the product rule?
Hold on, I ha
Okay. So you're confidant that you have the right equation?
If you are, we can begin turning it into words.
The next part is a snap, isn't it? Just take another look at the question.
@kmchargue You still there?
@goformit100 Great. It looks like you scared her off. :(
I'm here i'm here. Sorry. I believe that would be the right equation but of course I could be wrong.
Okay. Good. I'd like to learn more about all of this stuff. I've seen the Product Rule explained, but I don't really remember it right now. Can you help me out, while I'm helping you?
Looks good to me, but you can always doublecheck with someone. After all, you're clearly not someone who wants other people to do her homework for her.
it's the product of the first function and the derivative of the second function plus the product of the derivative of the first function and the second function
Ah, I remember that now. I wonder how in the world that relates to this. Haha. Really. I don't get it?
Neither do I. I'm just lost haha.
There's some connection. We just need to figure out what it is. It's in there. We'll get it.
What is expected in the answer is given as well as Answers: A complete answer to the middle paragraph should explain what Jessie's friend did and why it is wrong (by a lot) in plain, common sense, English. This will almost certainly already include an indication of what further information is needed, but if not that should be included as well. A complete answer to the last paragraph will state the product rule, describe the relation of the derivative to the change, describe how the weekly pay is a product and how the product rule works in this case. An A-level answer will compare this calculus method to the direct calculation, using some made-up but reasonable values for the missing information. Answers that are not written at the college level, for instance, answers not using complete sentences, will be assigned a failing grade.
"to calculate the actual change" in the pay? How is this related to the product rule in calculus class?
So, change and calculus. We're onto something there.
Oh, the full question helps. A LOT. :)
It's a start haha
"Answers that are not written at the college level, for instance, answers not using complete sentences, will be assigned a failing grade." YIKES!!! Tough teacher.
Well, what do you say we right out in words what we know right now. That will give us some confidence, I HOPE. Haha
Ok that works haha.
"A complete answer to the middle paragraph should explain" What's he/she mean by middle paragraph.
The first piece of the puzzle that you would need is the amount of hours Jessie works per week. Jessie will not be making just 2 more dollars a week he would also be getting an additional 50 cents for each hour that he is working. The product rule is d/dxf(x)g(x)=f′(x)g(x)+f(x)g′(x)
Is the first paragraph the initial situation?
Yeah for some reason it didn't separate into paragraphs when I posted it on here
No, I mean the instructions seem to indicate that this should be in the middle paragraph, or am I confused about that?
Why is Jessie's friend wrong about the change in Jessie's weekly pay? What more do we need to know about Jessie's work situation to calculate the actual change in the pay? was considered the "second or middle" paragraph
I admire the way you're going about this. So many people wait until the last instance to begin. You've given yourself plenty of time. Plas, it might really help with future problems you come across.
So it's just saying a complete answer to what it's asking there
Well, maybe we should go about it that way in any event. Know what I mean. Set it up, and then explain why the guy is wrong. Then lastly, explain how it is related to the Product Rule.
That sounds like the best way to go about it
So, the first paragraph would be something like this, it seems to me-- Jessie received a $0.50 per hour raise as well as 4 more hours of work per week. Yet, her friend thinks she is only making two more dollars a week. Here's why her friend is wrong.
Then the next paragraph will explain in order why he's wrong.
Do you feel up to giving that one a shot?
How about we both work on it seperately, and we can compare paragraphs?
Jessies' friend isn't taking into account all of the required information. For one thing, he's overlooking the fact that the raise applies to her entire salary, and not simply the additional four hours she is getting.
Alright that'll do
That's what I have as well
Jessies' friend isn't taking into account all of the required information. He's overlooking the fact that the raise applies to her entire salary, and not simply the additional four hours she is getting.
Okay. What next?
Describe the relation of the derivative or the original pay to the change, describe how the weekly pay is a product and how the product rule works in this situation
Good. Better might be a segue into the Product Rule. But let's leave that for later.
Since calculus is all about rates of change, we have to include that.
Yes, I was just about to mention that
There's the unkown amount of what she initially made, but that's not a problem--I think. Because wouldn't the rate of change be simllar? perhaps in the same family of functions?
Actually, since you know more about this than I do, you should make the final decision. Although I am decently good at English.
Putting it into words hopefully won't be too much of a struggle. All I really need to do now is plug in some reasonable numbers for the missing information and work out the equations using the product rule.
You knw, km, being on Open Study here for alomost two weeks now has been a humbling experience for me. I'm realizing just how much stuff I DON'T know. :(
Okay. Hold on. I'll find someone who can help you without doing it for you. I know some people here who are like that. Hold on.
Be right back.
Ok thank you so much
Ok, new Open Study friend. I think I'll have a calculus expert here shortly.
In the meanwhile, have you ever watched Futurama?
Because Jessie's friend seems about as smart as Fry. :)
Hahaha yes
Love that Bachelor Chow. Yummy.
Here's the link to those textbooks I mentioned. It'll save you lots of money. Or your parents, anyway. :) http://opencoursescholar.wordpress.com/resources/openstax-textbooks/
Ok thank you :)
If we do any more studying together on any subject, it will be nice to work from the same textbook.
Of course
What's next on your academic agenda? What classes are you taking?
Business writing, marketing, econ, terminology
Lots to do
Ah, economics. I'm reading "Wealth of Nations" right now. You really should read it. It's never taught in school, even though it's one of the best books of all time. You know how with some books you need to get a commentary to understand it? . . .
Yes
You don't need a commentary for this book. It's filled with straightforward really interesting sentences. Absolutely HIGHLY recommend it!!!!
I think someone will be here shortly.
@goformit100 We need a calculus expert and can't seem to find one right now. Can you help?
I hope so!
I have an idea. What if I laced the same question up. Then you could have what we've done here and a new one for someone to come across. (They only let you ask one question at a time.)
Yes that will work!
Okay. Its at the top of the list, and someone is looking it over now.
Why not just bump the question lol
I'm new to all this. Not quite sure what I'm doing.
Because it has such a long discussion on it.
Try this discussion: http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/5271aa24e4b077aaee83f022
I'm really feeling bad that you aren't getting the help you need. You deserve it. You're a very good student.
@kmchargue Just follow @tkhunny 's link theres the answer
Thank you. I'll get in eventually.
@GirlByte No kidding. How'd that happen?
I saw that. But it mentions how the comparison doesn't add up so I was confused.
it needs to be set up in equation form so if we set x=original hours worked y=original new per hour xy=overall pay new pay= (x+4)(y+0.5) = xy+.5x+4y+2 increase= 0.5x+4y+2 but how to relate that to the product rule??
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!