PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!! How can I solve an exponetial model to make an inverse one ?
That would depend on the exponential model. Please provide one and give it your best effort.
h(t)=106(0.95)^t+50
I got as far as \[t-50\div160=0.95^{h}\]
Pretty good, excepting that you have forgotten your Order of Operations. I hope you mean \((t-50)/160 = 0.95^{h}\). Without the parentheses, it is quite a different matter. Have you considered introducing a logarithm?
Yes, which is where I get confused
log\[\log_{0.95}(t-50)\div160=\log_{0.95}(0.95)^h\]
Logs base 0.95?!! Why on earth would you do that? Use somethin normal. \(\log\left(\dfrac{t-50}{160}\right) = \log\left(0.95^{h}\right)\) Now, use logarithm rules. \(\log\left(\dfrac{t-50}{160}\right) = h\cdot\log\left(0.95\right)\) You're almost done. Note: You can use the logs base 0.95 if you want, but I'm guessing that will be more confusing.
Okay so for the the side with H I would get -0.022
How do I get rid of that ?
?
Why did you get that at all? \(\log(0.95)\) is just fine.
and that would be my inverse function ?
Well, did you solve for \(h\)?
h=1/160 log(t-50)/log(.95)
Is that simplified enough ?
?? How did the 160 get outside the logarithm? If you were to use logarithm rules, you should get \(\log((t-50)/160) = \log(t-50) - log(160)\).
You can also use the base transformation to rewrite a little, but it's still not very pretty. \(\dfrac{\log\left(\dfrac{t-50}{160}\right)}{\log(0.95)} = \log_{0.95}\left(\dfrac{t-50}{160}\right) = h\)
okay thank you
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!