Question

=

Answer 1

The question is below each graph. The graph is my answer. It is suppose to match the coordinates given in the question.

Answer 2

I really have 0 idea what I'm doing, so a lot of them may be wrong...

Answer 3

your pdf file is not showing up for me.

Answer 4

Oh no! Is it showing up for anyone here?

Answer 5

nothing :(

Answer 6

Okay thanks for trying :)

Answer 7

Not sure if anyone here gets odt....
I'll make it into a word...

Answer 8

@phi
One last try?
Now I have a .pdf .odt and .doc

Answer 9

Any luck?

Answer 10

this is what I got

Answer 11

Oh lol! That wouldn't be of any use without the graphs lol :D

Answer 12

Thank you for your time :)

Answer 13

I'm able to see them. :)

Answer 14

Oh okay! :D

Answer 15

I haven't done this in a while, but if I remember correctly, you only have 2 that are completely correct. The other ones have a couple of things wrong with them. =)

Answer 16

Thank you! :)

Answer 17

Your welcome. Do you wan't me to tell you what you've done wrong?

Answer 18

Lol of course!! Please do! I really need help!

Answer 19

if -3/2 is y intercept then x=2 and y=3 so as far as i think you did a little bit mistake just start your slope lind from 3 one number

Answer 20

Ok, well for #1, its correct. You graphed (-2, 3) with a slope of zero.
#2. You graphed (2, -4) correctly. But for \[\frac{ 3 }{ -2 }\], You should remeber that its rise over run. This means that you go "up" however many times the top number says (rise), so you should go from -4 to -1. Then you need to follow -2 (run). You need to plot at (-2, -1). Does this make sense?

Answer 21

Oh okay! Yes it does :)

Answer 22

Ok, so now that I've told you that, do you see whats wrong with the rest of them, (except for 1 more) or do you want me to show you them too? :)

Answer 23

I believe so! Thank you :-)

Answer 24

did you get?

Answer 25

Your Welcome! If you have any more questions, let me know! =D