Divergence Theorem see attachment
hold up let me try to attempt #16...but geez when I take the partial derivatives, I get screwed over on the j term
@Euler271 @ChristopherToni
are you taking grad(F)?
the gradient of*
wait wait... I'm using divergence Theorem...I'll get an attachment on sonosfnosdfh
what's the entire formula?
k hold on
that front page should have the divergence
oh crud I have to find the outward flux using the divergence theorem
across the boundary of region d
this is just an example
but what's strange is that for the previous problems I didn't have to use the n part...you just have to find whatever the equation is with the divergence theorem and then afterwards you integrate according to what the D is saying
@ChristopherToni
you can also do it the normal way I think. Like you have it. \[\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\int\limits_{1}^{\sqrt2}\int\limits_{2}^{-1} \nabla F\ rdzdrd \theta\]
but the problem is that I have a z lurking in its a**. How do I get rid of it?
damn z. if that was gone it would make my life easier
O_O so I can start to do antiderivatives all the way in terms of z rdr and dtheta?
i'm pretty sure you can. do you have the solution?
not yet this is what I have so far..the r in the denominator... might cause problems or not
you know what, im really not sure anymore. i would forget what i said about being able to mix polar and z. try doing it the lame way with x, y and z but you might just need to use the surface way.
there's just...blah I got stuck in the middle of all this...the only way I could get through is accidentally getting the partial derivative of y wrong for the j term.
So, for starters, if \(\large F= \left\langle \ln(x^2+y^2),\dfrac{2z}{x}\arctan\dfrac{y}{x}, z\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\right\rangle\) we have that \[\large \begin{aligned}\mathrm{div}\,F &= \nabla\cdot F \\ &= \frac{2x}{x^2+y^2}+\frac{2z}{x}\frac{x^2}{x^2+y^2}\cdot \frac{1}{x} + \sqrt{x^2+y^2}\\ &= \frac{2x+2z}{x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \end{aligned}\] In cylindrical coordinates, this would simplify to \(\large \dfrac{2\cos\theta}{r} +\dfrac{2z}{r^2}+r\). Also, in cylindrical coordinates, \(\large 1\leq x^2+y^2\leq 2\implies 1\leq r\leq \sqrt{2}\text{ and } 0\leq \theta\leq 2\pi\) (since there was no restriction on which octant we're working in), and \(\large -1\leq z\leq 2\). Therefore, the triple integral you should get in cylindrical coordinates is \[\large \iiint\limits_G\mathrm{div}\,F\,dV = \int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^{\sqrt{2}}\int_{-1}^2 2\cos\theta+\frac{2z}{r}+r^2\,dz\,dr\,d\theta\] I assume you can take things from here?
ok let me try getting this on paint and come back
hey! Wouldn't there be a dzrdrdtheta?
yes but he included the r already. its fully simplified and ready to integrate lol
Yea, I got a little lazy at the end and simplified it all the way through...lol
fjdsksalsdajdskl crap I added an r one sec
ok I got two different answers thanks to the slip up ROFL
have no idea which is right the black or the blue
o-o
ughhhh there's an error oh mannn!
You're missing some numbers throughout the calculation. XD We have that \[\large \begin{aligned} &\phantom{=}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^{\sqrt{2}}\int_{-1}^2 2\cos\theta+\frac{2z}{r}+r^2\,dz\,dr\,d\theta \\ &= \int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^{\sqrt{2}}\left.\left[2z\cos\theta + \frac{z^2}{r}+r^2z\right]\right|_{-1}^2\,dr\,d\theta\\ &= \int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^{\sqrt{2}}\left[\left( 4\cos\theta+\frac{4}{r}+2r^2\right) -\left(-2\cos\theta + \frac{1}{r} - r^2\right)\right]\,dr\,d\theta\\ &= \int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^{\sqrt{2}} 6\cos\theta + \frac{3}{r}+3r^2\,dr\,d\theta \\ &= \int_0^{2\pi}\left.\left[6r\cos\theta +3\ln r + r^3\right]\right|_1^{\sqrt{2}}\,d\theta\\ &= \int_0^{2\pi}\left[\left( 6\sqrt{2}\cos\theta +3\ln\sqrt{2} +(\sqrt{2})^3\right)-\left(6\cos\theta +3\ln 1 + 1\right)\right]\,d\theta\\ &= \int_0^{2\pi} (6\sqrt{2}-6)\cos\theta +3\ln\sqrt{2}+2\sqrt{2}-1 \,d\theta \\ &= \left.\left[(6\sqrt{2}-6)\sin\theta +(3\ln\sqrt{2}+2\sqrt{2}-1)\theta \right]\right|_0^{2\pi}\\ &= 2\pi(3\ln\sqrt{2} +2\sqrt{2} -1)\\ &= \pi(6\ln\sqrt{2}+4\sqrt{2}-2)\\ &= \pi (\ln 8 +4\sqrt{2}-2)\end{aligned}\]
i get the same result. i derived 3/r instead of integrating it
I might have finally got it, but the damn distribute the whole thing with r first threw my a** off
because I'm used to doing dzrdrdtheta
ok so all I need is just one more and that's #22 with this super box thing and I'm done
Ah, I was taught to do it the other way: \(r\,dz\,dr\,d\theta\) and then simplify everything first.. XD
not in my class hell no... lol
#22 only and that's it YAY!
Ugh...I loathe flux... >_>
For 22, though, note that \(\nabla\cdot F = 1-2+1 = 0\), but I'm not sure what to do from here. XD
damn me neither
maybe that's it? lol
well we could dydx it? since y =0 y = 1 x = 0 x =1
|dw:1386561427487:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!