Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 24 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

How do I evaluate this integral?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, it says to Find \[\prime(x)=\int\limits \left(\begin{matrix}2013 \\ 5-x^2\end{matrix}\right)\sqrt{10-t} dt\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

any help would be really appreciated! :(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

trying to find

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[f \prime(x)=\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large f'(x)\quad=\quad \int\limits_{5-x^2}^{2013}\sqrt{10-t}\;dt\]Find \(\Large f(x)\). Is that the problem? The way you wrote it is a little strange, so just checking :o

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, but switch the f(x) with f '(x). sorry I didn't make it clear enough

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the original problem is f(x) and it's asking to find f ' (x).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large f(x)\quad=\quad \int\limits\limits_{5-x^2}^{2013}\sqrt{10-t}\;dt\]Find \(\Large f'(x)\). Ok now it makes more sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

correct. sorry about that!

zepdrix (zepdrix):

We'll need to apply the `Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1`:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}\int\limits_a^x f(t)\;dt \quad=\quad f(x)\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Before we do the actual math, try to think about what's happening a sec. ~We're Integrating (anti-differentiating) ~Then we're differentiating. So we're doing something, then doing the opposite.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hold on. how do we know we don't use the fundamental theorem, part 2?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

You can use the FTC Part 2 to do the integration, then after you've done that, apply the derivative operator. But that whole process is summed up in the FCT Part 1.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

FTC* blah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah, okay. so if I start to apply theorem part 1, then would the first step be:

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ok think about this process a sec:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}\int\limits\limits_a^x f(t)\;dt\quad=\quad \frac{d}{dx}F(t)|_a^x\quad=\quad \frac{d}{dx}\left[F(x)-F(a)\right]\]\[\Large =\quad f(x)-0\]F(a) is a constant, it's derivative is 0.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Where F(t) is the anti-derivative of f(t)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

We started with some function, we integrate, then the inside (arguments) of the function changes due to our boudaries, then we differentiate, getting back what we started with, but in terms of our new variable.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

first, don't I need to reverse the bounds because the (5-x^2) should be on top?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Mmmm if you'd like to yes you can do that :)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

You don't have to though, check this out a sec,

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Let's try to apply this to our problem:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}\int\limits\limits\limits_{5-x^2}^{2013}f(t)\;dt\quad=\quad \frac{d}{dx}F(t)|_{5-x^2}^{2013}\] Let's not worry about what f(t) is right now, it's just the thing we're integrating. It's integrates to give us `something` that we call F(t). Evaluating at the boundaries gives us:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}\left[F(2013)-F(5-x^2)\right]\]Then we take our derivative.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The fact that our x shows up in the lower boundary means that we'll have an extra negative showing up, right? You would get the same result if you had just swapped the limits at the start anyway.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Confusing? :c

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm trying to process everything you've said so far, sorry, I'm a slow reader x)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

hehe :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay, so right now, I need to find the antiderivative of \[\sqrt{10-t} \] and then input in the boundaries? and then take the derivative of the result?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

We DO NOT need to find it's antiderivative. We are calling the antiderivative F(t), whatever that may be. After plug in the bounds, we'll end up back at little f. So we're not actually doing the integration of sqrt(10-t).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Here is a quick example:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

GAH. Idk why this is going over my head. :/ sorry

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large \frac{d}{dt}\int\limits \frac{e^{\sqrt{\arctan t^2}}}{t^2-4e^t}dt\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So in the example here, the solution to this integral probably doesn't even exist. But we're asked to integrate, and then afterwards, take the derivative (which will undo the integration). So we can think of it like this:\[\Large \frac{d}{dt}\int\limits\limits \frac{e^{\sqrt{\arctan t^2}}}{t^2-4e^t}dt\quad=\quad \frac{d}{dt}\int\limits f(t)\;dt\]Where f(t) is that big messy thing.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

"Integrating" would give us some function, we'll call F(t),\[\Large \frac{d}{dt}F(t)\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Then we take it's derivative giving us:\[\Large f(t)\quad=\quad \frac{e^{\sqrt{\arctan t^2}}}{t^2-4e^t}\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The thing we started with. Does that make a little sense? :o

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Or if we need to go even simpler:\[\Large \frac{d}{dt}\int\limits t^2\;dt \quad=\quad \frac{d}{dt}\frac{1}{3}t^3\]\[\Large =\quad t^2\]Yes..?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay, I think I'm starting to see it. so if we go back to the original problem. \[d/dx [F(2013) -F(5-x^2)]\] =\[d/dx [\sqrt{10-2013} - \sqrt{10-5-x^2}]\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large F(t)\quad\ne\quad \sqrt{10-t}\]It's the anti-derivative of that function. We don't have a function to look at until we do the derivative :(

zepdrix (zepdrix):

From here:\[\Large \frac{d}{dx}\left[F(2013)-F(5-x^2)\right]\]Taking the derivative of each term gives us:\[\Large \left[0-f(5-x^2)(5-x^2)'\right]\] It gets a tad trickier lol We have to apply the chain rule :(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if you're just applying the chain rule to (5-x^2) won't you just get -2x?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large \left[0-f(5-x^2)(-2x)\right]\]Yes good. The function little f was the thing we started with (the square root).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\Large =2x\cdot f(\color{royalblue}{5-x^2})\quad=\quad 2x\cdot\sqrt{10-(\color{royalblue}{5-x^2})}\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Where our original function was:\[\Large f(\color{royalblue}{t})\quad=\quad \sqrt{10-(\color{royalblue}{t})}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so essentially we now get back to what we started with except we have a new variable, (5-x^2), for t? we don't do anything with 2x?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

correct. We have a new argument, (5-x^2) in place of t, and we get an extra factor of 2x outside due to the chain rule

OpenStudy (anonymous):

=\[2x \sqrt{5+x^2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so that is the final?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Mmmmmmm yah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Omg. Okay, thank you so much!! Sorry I was so slow x( Good thing I have 12 more problems just exactly like this, so it'll be good practice for me! Thanks again for being so patient, seriously!

zepdrix (zepdrix):

ya hopefully it's a good start towards understanding the others D':

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It is! I know the general idea and steps on what the heck I'm doing now, so I'm not so lost. :) Thx again

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!