can someone show the process for solving this partial fraction? http://math.feld.cvut.cz/mt/exd/1/gif1/ecd1aj.gif
is the denominator in prime factors already?
regradless, it look like you have degree 2 factors; which would require us to account for at best, linear numerators
\[\frac{1}{f^2g^2}=\frac{a_1x+b_1}{f^2}+\frac{a_2x+b_2}{g^2}\] then its just a matter of redoing the addition and comparing parts
Hello, Castiel, The rational function you present is 1 --------------------- and this can be re-written as (x^2 + 1)(x^2 + 2x + 1) 1 ---------------------- . (x^2 + 1) (x + 1)^2 In words, you have a "repeated root" in that (x + 1)^2. I have little idea where you're coming from and am prepared to explain in more detail if need be But for now, you can break up your rational expression/ function as follows: 1 Ax + B C D ----------------- = ----------- + ------------- + ------------- (x^2 + 1) (x + 1)^2 (x^2 + 1) x + 1 (x + 1)^2 The next task is to determine the values of A, B, C and D that make this equation true. A good place to start is to multiply each of the three fractions on the right by the quantity necessary to make every denominator = to (x^2 + 1) (x + 1)^2 . Then you can cross out all of the (equal) denominators and concentrate on the equation in x, A, B, C and D that remains. Need help in determining A, B, C and D? If so, just ask. Best to you.
Sorry I haven't been more accurate about the problem I'm having. First of all, thank you for your explanation, it has been really helpful. I can do some simpler fractions of this sort but I'm having trouble finding a,b,c,d when I have repeated root and Ax+B. In what order should I start determining them? Thank you.
Castiel, If you do as I've suggested, you'll get the following equation: 1=(Ax+B)(x+1)^2 + C(x^2+1)(x+1) + D(x^2+1). I'd suggest you verify this for yourself. There are several ways to solve for the coefficients A, B, C and D. I believe you'll end up in every case with a system of four equations in four unknowns, which could be solved with matrices, determinants, addition/subtraction and/or substitution. I note that substituting the x value -1 will result in the following equation: 1 = (Ax+B)(0) + C(2)(0) + D(3). Therefore, D = 1/3. This would leave you with a system of 3 equations in 3 unknowns. Since there is no other convenient x value at which the terms of my equation (above) would be mostly zero, we're left with the possibility of choosing other, distinct, simple values of x, such as x=0, x=1, x=-2, x=2, and so on. Each time you substitute such a value, you'll get a new set of linear equations in A, B, C and D (or fewer, if you've already found values such as D = 1/3). Want to give this a try? Just ask if you have more questions. Good luck!
PS: The order in which you determine your A, B, C, D is immaterial. It just happened that I was able to determine that D = 1/3 simply by letting x = 1. As I said earlier, there is no other convenient x value ... (see above).
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!