How to read this notation, and make sense of it: AxB := { {x, {x,y}} : x in A, y in B } A cross B is defined to be the set of ..... i got no idea how to make sense of the {x,[x,y]} part of it
this is somehow spose to define the ordered pair (x,y) but i just cant make heads or tails of it .... topology by the way
to me, x in A and {x,y} in B
might help to see it in the book ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_product#Most_common_implementation_.28set_theory.29
It does say that \[\Large \{x,\{x,y\}\}\] is just a fancy way of writing \[\Large (x,y)\] Since, later on on that page, it redefines it, sort of...
yeah, i did read past it lol ... im just wondering how to comprehend what the first set of subsets? ... reads out as.
the set with elements x and {x,y} such that x in ... y in ...
As per the wikipedia link (for all it's worth) that {x , {x,y}} is supposed to be a set of sets...though, I still don't see what use that serves... yeah... I'm lost XD
the karatowski definition eh
maybe just look at it as organasing the cartesian product set by elements with comun 1º element and different 2º element. So you would have as many groups as different 1º elements are there
just leaves me wondering what 1 and 2 degree elements mean :/
I think this is to make consistent with set theories ... such that (x,y) is itself a set.
I suspect Kuratowski was drunk :> Maybe this way, you are spared from having to define a 'first' coordinate and a 'second' coordinate for your ordered pair, since your first coordinate is the only element that appears in all the sets in {{x} , {x,y}} ...
let A = {1,2,3} let B = {a,b} AxB = {(1,a), (1,b), (2,a), (2,b), (3,a), (3,b)} and this is the power set of (the power set of(AuB))
Don't you mean a subset of the powerset of A U B ? :3
:)
AuB = {1,2,3,a,b} ... no, a subset of the power set of the powerset of lol
Oh yeah >.> Blasted nests...
under that def ... i think it's not subset of power set of power ... on this Kru...'s def ... i think it will be subset of ...
the power set of AuB is: well, it has 2^5 elements .... does that mean that there are 2^(2^5) elements of AxB ?
No... since AxB isn't exactly equal to the powerset of the powerset of blablabla It's just a subset, right?
no ... there is 2*3 elements of AxB so AxB is subset of power set of ...
then why did i get 6 elements for AxB?
Simply because there are? :3
because there are six elements of AxB
...six elements, I mean.
...what eX said :D
lol, im sure you typed 2^3 first
Wasn't that 2*3? D:
there is something like every object is a set itself in some set theories like ZF set theory or naive set theory. IDK i haven't studied. (a,b) is simply a tuple ... not a set itself. also \( (a,b) \) is not subset of that power set. but under this def (a, b) = {a, {a,b}} it becomes subset of that power whatever set and consistent with those stupid set theories. .... I think but not sure.
this is what we get for letting the germans play with numbers ...
{a, {a,b}} is not element of set ... but a set itself.
LOL
but Kuratowski was Polish? :/
Poland was occupied wasnt it?
Oh great.. history... well, his part of Poland was Russian-occupied, not Prussian >:)
I thought he was russian ... many russian names ends with 'i' or 'y'
:) ive got to get back to data entry before i cant pay the rent ... thanx yall
To avoid ambiguity, Russian '-ski' names use '-sky' instead, so that '-ski' usually indicates a Polish name... and should we really go off-topic here? (on a mod's question, no less XD)
good luck (y)
edit *{a, {a,b}} is not just element of set ... but a set itself.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!