Are humans still evolving? Explain your answer.
Why not ask this in biology section instead?
humans are still evolving, why wouldn't we be?
Because I wanna see of math people are stupid enough to believe in evolution
evolution is is not real
... there is a lot of evidence for evolution
all of the so called evidence have failed
Yes. Do you know how some pinky toes are under peoples foot? Thats because our pinky toes are evolving away. My pinky toe is completely straight so my offspring will need quite a few more generation to have no pinky toes.
and evolution does not refute the existence or omnipotence of God, so why refuse to believe in it?
It's a matter of an opinion ..
beside it is easy to make a skull look like anything you want it to be, so therefore there are no real evidence of evolution
Please, nobody throw "seeded planet" and Nibiru into this conversation...
This is a hard math question, idk.
gotta find that formula, Solomon.
"beside it is easy to make a skull look like anything you want it to be" what?
Humans are technically still evolving, but are mostly subject to the conditions of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and so are not prone to any drastic "immediate" (in the geological time sense) changes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy%E2%80%93Weinberg_principle
Why are moderators not stopping this?
now since this is bio I'm going to close it, ya'll can keep it up if you want
you're getting your information from wiki
there's a couple here...
Find the quote that I just said on the wiki link I sent you. I actually did take biology, believe it or not.
I took Biology too.
taking a class is no substitute for thinking for yourself
@Peter14 I agree, which is why I don't agree with my teacher when she said evolution is correct, and that's not just because she's a woman.
It really depends on your view; personally I don't see that we evolved from apes due to the DNA issue, of that strand thing. (Don't ask, I forgot my biology, I am sure nature.com has it somewhere written down). I think our origin is more complex, and if someone actually does figure it out, they are truly a genius. Evolution isn't at all a stupid idea, in fact it is genius idea; I just believe you can only evolve so far. Then again I swear I saw a fishman in the sewers once.
opcode lol
I don't see how taking a class and thinking for yourself are mutually exclusive, I was, in fact, pointing out that my response is coming from me and not wikipedia. I'm no great biologist by any means, but all signs point to evolution to 99.99...% of biologists. Again, this should being the bio section so someone qualified like @blues can give a real answer,
Actually, all signs point to creation 99.99%
Yes! I have a smartphone. My dad did not have a smartphone when he was my age.
Yes, all organisms on earth are evolving. From humans right down to the simplest bacterial species. Evolution is a spontaneous, natural, constant process affecting all organisms in the discrete steps between generations - it is a necessary (and perhaps, debatably, sufficient?) condition for defining "life" from "non-life." That said, different populations of humans are evolving at different rates. In populations facing essentially unchanged selective pressures for thousands of years - individuals in hunter gatherer societies, for examples) evolution is maybe occurring more slowly than those in developed societies. And the different humans systems are evolving at different rates - the immune system, the endocrine system and the reproductive system are evolving the fastest. As you'd expect, given that humans have most dramatically altered the microbial and parasitic environments in which we life - and thus the immune challenges that we face - in the last hundred years. A few notes from the discussion: I should note that my toes are also straight with apparently far reaching implications for any putative offspring. It is not 99.99% but 100% of scientists who support evolution. Evolution and belief in a divine being who created an evolutionary system are not mutually exclusive, though I don't happen to hold the latter belief. And humans did not evolve 'from apes' per se but from a common, probably ape like ancestor that we share with modern apes. I have never in fifteen years as a biologist heard of 'that strand thing' or any 'DNA issue' that refutes this theory (and quite a few discussions that support it) and in the interest of my own elucidation would appreciate a specific reference beyond a generic one to Nature's online website.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!