Hey guys, up for proving something?
Prove: \[\LARGE 2+2=5\]
you must have divided by 0
Watch and learn yo
Divide by 0?
i think ur 1 is tryin 2 b d invisible man oops, sry..invisible number
Hmm... To prove that I'll start off with something that is true: say... \[-20=-20\] rewriting them a little: \[16-36=25-45\] I'll rewrite them again: \[(2+2)^{2}-(2+2)(9)=5^{2}-(5)(9)\] if I multiply and divide by two, and reorder: \[(2+2)^{2}-(2)(2+2)(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })=5^{2}-(2)(5)(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })\] just playing a little with squares and fractionary statments: \[(2+2)^{2}-(2)(2+2)(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })+(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })^{2}=5^{2}-(2)(5)(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })+(\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })^{2}\] Now with that, I can complete some squares: \[(2+2-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })^{2}=(5-\frac{ 9 }{ 2 })^{2}\] by cancelative property then I can remove the 9/2 and take square roots on both sides to end with: \[2+2=5\] There is a mistake here though, try find it.
u divided only d no 9 by 2 instead of d entire 2(2+2)(9)
dont we have two possibilities \[2+2-\frac{9}{2}=+(5-\frac{9}{2})\] and \[2+2-\frac{9}{2}=-(5-\frac{9}{2})=-5+\frac{9}{2}\] and the combination of this equations wen added gives \[2+2=0\implies 2=0\] wich we divided and multiplied with ealier
no its not zero its \[2(2+2)=9\implies 2+2-\frac{9}{2}=0\] meaning the 2nd last equation yields \[( 2+2-\frac{9}{2})^2=(5-\frac{9}{2})^2=0\]
this is crazy
I know, right?
Thank you @Owlcoffee :)
@Jordannyah Will this work for ya?
the paradox is the same \[x=y\\x^2=xy\\x^2-y^2=xy-y^2\\(x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y)\\x+y=y\\x+x=y\\2x=y\implies 2=1\implies 2+3=1+3\implies 5=4\] but here its obvious the error was dividing by zero \[x-y=0\]
the problem with @Owlcoffee proof is using the wrong implication that if\[a^2=b^2\implies a=b\]instead of \[a=\pm b\]
you discovered me! :( .... *hides under rock*
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!