The population of Bhopal is 12, 00,000. But 25% of the population dies due to the gas tragedy. The population increases at 10% p.a. However every year 20% of the new born child dies due to post effect of gas leakage. What will be the population of Bhopal after 4 years?
What a horrible question. Who thinks up this stuff? There is not enough information. We don't know how many babies are born. We cannot compute 20% of a value that cannot be known.
Starting population: 1200000 (I am not going to use commas. British system has lakhs which is hundred thousand and they put comma to denote 12 lakhs). 25% of the population dies due to the gas leakage incident. The population that remains is: 75% or 0.75 * 1200000 = 900000. Every year population increases by 10%. For this problem we may have to assume this 10% is purely due to new births alone. Otherwise there is not enough info to work the problem. 20% or one-fifth of new borns persish. So the population increases by 8% each year. Use the same formula as the one used to compute compound interest. So in 4 years the population will be: 900000(1 + .08)^4 PS: This assumes no adult dies in those 4 years! Because if the adults die and the population still increases by 10% then more percentage of babies will have to be born to compensate for the adults dying. Overall this problem is a horrible one with missing info.
1. 12,22,440 2. 12,27,540 3. 12,24,440 4. 12,28,660 options
There are ways to create reasonable assumptions. First, recognize the insufficiency of the problem statement. Just throwing out numbers... 12,000,000 people Say 60% Adult 7,200,000 adults Say 50% are women 3,600,000 adult women Say 40% of those are child-bearing age 1,440,000 adult women of child-bearing age Say 90% are able to function in a behavior that might cause pregnancy. 1,296,000 Eligible for pregnancy Say 90% actually manage pregnancy. 1,166,400 Say 85% of pregnancies manage to reach full-term 991,440 Say 80% of babies live more than 6 months 793,152 793,152 / 12,000,000 = 0.066096 -- Okay, 6%ish. Frankly, I'm a little astonished how close this is to ranga's 8%, assuming that ALL the growth is in birthing babies. Horrible assumption or no. Assumptions MUST be clearly explained.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!