Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Help me with this Algebra 2 Honors Assignment?? Graphing involved. 3. The following graph shows a seventh-degree polynomial: Part 1: List the polynomial’s zeroes with possible multiplicities. Part 2: Write a possible factored form of the seventh degree function. 4. Without plotting any points other than intercepts, draw a possible graph of the following polynomial: f(x) = (x + 8)^3(x + 6)^2(x + 2)(x – 1)^3(x – 3)^4(x – 6).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the question is not really clear are there exponents there? if they are all exponents there are way too many of them to be a seventh degree polynomial

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@satellite73 I fixed it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Kawaiicat123 Please help me. I have to get this done TODAY. ;A;

OpenStudy (axel.caballero):

heres your graph for # 4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Those are exponents(I fixed the question), not multiplication.. Could you please update that one..? :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Mathmale Can you please help me?? :(

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Hello, Hedgie, Glad to help. Take a good, hard look at the graph. If the graph CROSSES the x-axis at a certain x-value, the multiplicity of that root is likely to be 1. On the other hand, if the graph touches but does not cross the x-axis at a given x-value, the multiplicity of that root is likely to be 2. Categorize the roots you see in this illustration. The roots that have possible multiplicity 1 are ... ?? The roots that have pos. mult. 2 are ... ??

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Hedgie, are you absolutely positive that we're talking about a 7th order poly? Wouldn't a 7th order poly have 7 roots (whether real or complex), not just 6, and wouldn't the highest power be x^7?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, um, I think the ones with Mult. 1 are.. (4, 0) and (7, 0) And the one with mult 2 is (-1, 0). I'm probably wrong, though, aren't I?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, no wait, hang on. Mult. 1 are (4, 0), (7, 0) and (-1, 0) while mult 2 is (-5, 0).. Right??

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Hedgie, why on earth would you automaticallyl assume that you're "probably wrong"? I'd bet you're right many times more often than you are wrong. Your only sin is one of omission: I believe that the root at -5 also has multiplicity 2.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

So I see you got that on your own. Why change y our mind about the multiplicity of the root x=-1?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Let's go back and review this systematically. Looking at the graph, at which x-values does the graph touch the x-axis but not cross it? At which does the graph cross the x-axis?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I automatically assume I'm probably wrong because when it comes to math, I usually am. .-. I work off logic and common sense, not numbers. And I changed my mind because it crosses the x axis, and doesn't just touch it.. But by that thought, I guess (4, 0) just touches it as well, because it follows the axis for a point and then goes back off.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

You wouldn't be in Alg. II Honors were you a dummy. You're not a dummy. Please let's go back and "review this systematically," as I've suggested above.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm in Honors because that's where my school put me, because of how bad my grades in math have been. That's what my mom tells me, anyway. I personally think it was just a mistake. But okay, let's go back. Ones that cross the x axis: (-1, 0), (7, 0). Ones that touch the x axis: (-5, 0), (4, 0). Right??

OpenStudy (mathmale):

I find myself wondering about that x=4 and unsure of the multiplicity there. For Part I: Why don't we identify the four roots as you have (above), and accept only tentatively the multiplicities that stem from whether or not the graph crosses the x-axis at a given point? I'd like to move on to Part 2; we could return to Part 1. Willing to do that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sure, we can do that! As long as we get this done, I don't really care. ^^;;;

OpenStudy (mathmale):

If you're familiar with the Equation Editor (below), please type the polynomial in Part 2 in it. I find some ambiguities in f(x) = (x + 8)^3(x + 6)^2(x + 2)(x – 1)^3(x – 3)^4(x – 6).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, I can do that. :) \[f(x) = (x + 8)^3(x + 6)^2(x+2)(x - 1)^3(x-3)^4(x-6)\]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

So much clearer this way! Look carefully. What order do YOU think this poly has, and why?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

BRB

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If I'm supposed to re-arrange them, by exponent.. It'd be to \[f(x) = (x+2)(x-6)(x + 6)^2(x + 8)^3(x-3)^4\] by order of smallest to largest.. As for why, really because that's what I think I should do, and I kinda find it funny when numbers in equations look to be like they're counting(as in then they're just one higher or lower from each other, in succession, like (x + 1)(x + 2)(x + 3) and so on.).. Because I'm just silly like that.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Quick review: which order does the folloing poly have? x Which order: 3x^3-1 Which order? -2x5+x^3 -29

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Which order: (x-2)(x-3)(x+5)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm.. Not sure, honestly.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Sorry for the slow response; I didn't see your response. We need to review "order" as it applies here. Look at the four polys I've given you. The highest power in the first is 1, so we dub it a 1st order poly. The highest power in the 4th is 2, so we dub it a 2nd order poly. What about the 3rd poly? Of what order is it? Good idea to double check your textbook or look up "order of a polynomial" online.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_a_polynomial But anyway, check into that if you have the time and interest. Let's go back to Part 2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's alright, no worries. Could you please put the polys again? I don't see them. .-.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

f(x) = (x + 8)^3(x + 6)^2(x + 2)(x – 1)^3(x – 3)^4(x – 6). Please look at the first factor: (x+8)^3. the degree here is 3. The 2nd factor : (x+6)^2. degree is 2. Continue through the whole thing, adding together the number of degrees pertaining to each factor. I get 15. But you do it yourself, please.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I get 12, for that.. Unless I'm supposed to be counting the invisible ^1's, as well.. Then I get 15, too.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Right. You do have to count EVERY power. So 15 is right. Note, Hedgie, that this is an ODD degree. Remember, x, x^3, x^5, x^7, and so on, are odd powers of x. If you'd sketch a couple of these really quickly, you'd see that all have graphs that begin in QIII and end in Q1. Are you familiar with the terminology I'm using here?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

You don't have to show me your graphs; I just need for you to understand the principle involved.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm assuming you mean the quadrants of a graph. Right?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Let me respond with a graph showing the four quadrants.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

|dw:1389987327695:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!