How do I show the proof for: For all integers a, if a^2 = 0(mod 6), then a = 0(mod 6)? I think the answer is true, but I don't know how to prove it generally.
a=0(mod 6) multiplying both sides by a give us : a^2=0(mod 6)
thats the converse direction, but we wanto prove this : given a^2=0 mod 6, prove a = 0 mod 6
let me try :) @ganeshie8 watch me, please :) a^2 =0 (mod 6) a^2-0 =0 (mod6) (a+0)(a-0) =0 (mod 6) a+0 =0 (mod6) a =0 (mod 6)
:)
looks legit :) u have used quadratic congruences !
another long/boring way is : a^2 = 0 mod 6 => a^2 = 0 mod 2 a^2 = 0 mod 3 2 | a^2 => 2 | a 3 | a^2 => 3 | a since gcd(2,3) = 1, 2*3 | a a = 0 mod 6
hihihi....
Like you did 2 | a^2 => 2 | a, why not 6 | a^2 => 6 | a?
6 is not prime
OK, I got it!
im looking for a contradiction to show n | a^2 does not necessarily mean n | a but not getting any quick examples...
n is composite..
a = b (mod n) division is not allowed here unless 'a' and 'n' are coprime... so it shouldnt work in general....
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 0 2 4 0 2 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 0 4 2 0 4 2 5 0 5 4 3 2 1 0^2 = 0 1^2 = 1 2^2 = 4 3^2 = 3 4^2 = 4 5^2 = 1 proof by table
:)
learn every day!!
@ganeshie8 you said division is not allowed, so how do you consider the Quadratic congruence as you call it accepted ?
direct division is not allowed, division is defined as below :- a = b mod n a/c = b/c mod (n/gcd(c, n) )
when u divide, u need to divide the mod also by gcd(c, n) oly dividing the remainders will not work
(a+0)(a-0) =0 (mod 6) to a+0 =0 (mod6) isn't a direct division ?
thats just zero product property which is legal
it is legal in congruences also, not just algebra..
ab = 0 => either one of them or both are 0
Ok
here is one contradicting example for the statement : a^2 = 0 mod n does not necessarily mean a = 0 mod n 4^2 = 0 mod 16 , but 4 = 0 mod 16 is false.
isn't mod 6
we're talking in general
not specific to a 6 or something... 6 is not a special number... not worth remembering its properties by heart :)
good, How do you prove that 1^n+2^n+3^n+4^n=0 mod 5 ?
easy : 4 = -1 3 = -2 everything cancel out
u doing number theory or groups ?
or 1 and 2 congruent to -3 and -4 right ?
yes, 1 = -4 2 = -3
so it means always the number of sum parts must be even ?
im not sure we can generalize like that... wat do we get by generalizing that anyway ?
try this : find the remainder when \(\large 86^{1234921897129}\) is divided by 87
yup ! too easy for u Loser :)
nobody can help u cuz u are doing all tough problems nobody ever messed wid lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!