Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

12.) The Rational Function Has a y-Intercept of 7. What Is The Equation For This Function? Please Help, I don't Understand?!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please Help!! @phi ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Someone please??? Does anyone understand this??? @whpalmer4 @phi ???

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Okay, do you have any idea what the general form of the equation is?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

can you identify the asymptotes from the diagram?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, I Have No clue :(

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Can you give me the equations for the dashed lines on the diagram? Those the asymptotes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x=-2, y=-5?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops y=5

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@whpalmer4 ? you there?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:(

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

yes, those are correct. Do you understand what features of an equation would cause such asymptotes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No I dont..

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Okay, I was afraid of that, but I guess I'll just have to teach you the material :-) Let's take a simple case. \[y = \frac{1}{x}\]Graph looks like this:

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Is there a value of \(y\) at \(x = 0\)? If so, what is it? If not, why not?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait, why would the graph look like that? What makes the points be that way?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

What is 1/0 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's zero

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Ah, so 0*0 = 1?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

What is 2/0?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, hmm, Im confused ahha

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

if \(a/b = c\) then \(c*b = a\)

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

that implies that division by 0 is a no-no, because the only number we could divide by 0 would be 0 to have that be true.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

10/5 =2 because 2*5 = 10 So, we can't meaningfully divide by 0. There's a spot right there in the middle of the graph where we don't have a value! Now let's investigate a bit more. What if we have x = 2? y = 1/x = ?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

@MissLovelyPearlOyster are you going to respond?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry my teacher called me, just a minute lemme read all this..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y=1/2? Is that were the curve starts in the graph?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@whpalmer4 ?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

yes. if x=2, y = 1/2. how about if x = 1/2?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Idk, other than using a decimal on the bottom hah y=1/0.5?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

well, you should know how to divide by a fraction by now! Invert the fraction from the denominator and multiply by it instead: \[\frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}} = 1* \frac{2}{1} = 2\]

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

how about if x = 1/100, what is y?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y=100?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

yep. so, as we get closer and closer to x = 0, y gets bigger and bigger, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it does..

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Okay. what if we have x = -1? y =?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y=-1?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Yep. How about x = -1/2? x = -1/100? what happens as x gets closer and closer to x = 0, but from the negative side?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

y=-2, y=-100 ? and y gets smaller?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

it goes bigger and bigger, but in the negative direction. |y| increases, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes y gets smaller

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean bigger hahah

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

the magnitude of y gets larger...y becomes more and more negative. so on the left side of x = 0, y -> -infinity as we approach x = 0, and on the right side of x = 0, y -> + infinity as we approach x = 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay..

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

and that's exactly what the graph shows, of course. at x=0, y has to be in an infinite number of places at once :-) now, because y approaches that line x = 0 ever and ever closer without actually getting there, we call that an asymptote a vertical asymptote in this case

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

a rational function will have a vertical asymptote wherever the denominator = 0.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

our rational function is \[y = \frac{1}{x}\]there is a vertical asymptote at \(x = 0\) because the denominator is 0 there. Clear?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

What if we wanted a similar graph, except with a vertical asymptote at \(x = 1\)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm.. I honestly don't understand all you're big words ahaha

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

do you understand why we have a vertical asymptote at x = 0?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because y doesnt get to that point where x is 0?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

as we get closer and closer to x = 0, y gets closer and closer to the line x = 0, and if you tell me just how close you want it, I can tell you a spot where that is true. and it has a discontinuity where x = 0, because at x = 0-a little bit, y is negative, and at x = 0+a little bit, y is positive, and at no point does y ever equal 0. It has to "snap" from positive to negative, or the other way around. We call that a discontinuity, where there isn't a smooth connection.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

we get one at any value of \(x\) that makes our denominator = 0.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

how could we write a function that has a denominator that = 0 when x = 1?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

How about \[y = \frac{1}{x-1}\]?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

what is the value of \(x\) that makes the denominator = 0?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait a minute, lemme watch a video on this okay? When I come back, lemme see if i can answer you're questions :)

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

okay. btw, "you're" = "you are", "your" is the possessive, as in "your notebook"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know, auto correct, I totally messed up that word haha I'm only stupid in math, but a genius in English. Omg this is still confusing me, and I'm not really comprehending what you're saying. Just try and explain the problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

start with reading the book :D

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

well, let's let it go at this: if we want a vertical asymptote at some value of x, we need to arrange for the denominator to equal 0 when x equals that value where we want the vertical asymptote.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hahah my text book doesn't really cover this, they cover how to get the graph, not get the equation from the graph

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

if we want the denominator to equal 0 at x = -2, how about we use \[y = \frac{1}{x+2}\]?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Looks like this:

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

(ignore the vertical line at x = -2, that's an artifact of the graphing software)

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Looks like our graph, except not quite high enough up on the page, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it does.. where does the x=-2 and y=5 go in the equation? Those are the asymptotes right?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

well, they don't really go in the equation — the asymptotes are values that are never touched (in the case of vertical asymptotes), only approached

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

if we put the \(x=-2\) into our formula: \[y = \frac{1}{x+2} = \frac{1}{-2+2} = \frac{1}{0}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohh okay, see now this makes a tiny bit of sense

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So what does that have to do with the equation?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

that's our vertical asymptote.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhh because the -2 is the x asymptote, so we would plug that in for x? And it must equal to zero, so the denominator must be x+2 so the -2 crosses it out. Am I right so far?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

yes. to put a vertical asymptote at x = a, we need a term in the denominator: \((x-a)\) If we need multiple vertical asymptotes, we have a product in the denominator: \[(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)\]

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Remember that \(a,b,c\) may be positive or negative, so there may be + signs in the final equation, not just -.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but we dont need multiple vertical asymtotes right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is the denominator finished? y=1/(x+2) ? what about the top now?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry if im rushing you, I have to leave soon and really need this turned in

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

denominator is finished.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The top/ how would I do that? You're a great teacher btw

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

I'm still trying to figure out how to get the top and y-intercept...

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Okay, I think I have it. We can add 5 to the result of our fraction to shift the graph up by 5, right? \[y = \frac{1}{x+2}+5\]looks like

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Now, we need to adjust the sharpness of the "corner" so that the curve goes through the point \((0,7)\) We can do that by putting a value other than 1 in our numerator:

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

If we make our function \[y = \frac{a}{x+2}+5\]and find the value of \(a\) so that the curve goes through \((0,7)\) we'll be all set. \[7 = \frac{a}{0+2}+5\]\[7 = \frac{a}{2}+5\]\[a=\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so the numerator is 12?

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

No. try solving that again.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh a=4

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

Yes. So I believe our function is\[y = \frac{4}{x+2}+5\] It goes through our y-intercept of (0,7): \[y = \frac{4}{0+2}+5 = 2+5 = 7\] and it has the right asymptotes.

OpenStudy (whpalmer4):

We took the graph of \(y = f(x) = \frac{1}{x}\) and converted it to \[y=4f(x+2)+5\]which gives it a vertical stretching by a factor of 4, shifts it up 5, and left 2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OMG thank you!! I understand this now :) God bless you, and now I have to log off. Have a great day!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!