12.) The Rational Function Has a y-Intercept of 7. What Is The Equation For This Function? Please Help, I don't Understand?!
Please Help!! @phi ?
Someone please??? Does anyone understand this??? @whpalmer4 @phi ???
Okay, do you have any idea what the general form of the equation is?
can you identify the asymptotes from the diagram?
No, I Have No clue :(
Can you give me the equations for the dashed lines on the diagram? Those the asymptotes
x=-2, y=-5?
oops y=5
@whpalmer4 ? you there?
:(
yes, those are correct. Do you understand what features of an equation would cause such asymptotes?
No I dont..
Okay, I was afraid of that, but I guess I'll just have to teach you the material :-) Let's take a simple case. \[y = \frac{1}{x}\]Graph looks like this:
Is there a value of \(y\) at \(x = 0\)? If so, what is it? If not, why not?
Wait, why would the graph look like that? What makes the points be that way?
What is 1/0 ?
It's zero
Ah, so 0*0 = 1?
What is 2/0?
No, hmm, Im confused ahha
if \(a/b = c\) then \(c*b = a\)
that implies that division by 0 is a no-no, because the only number we could divide by 0 would be 0 to have that be true.
10/5 =2 because 2*5 = 10 So, we can't meaningfully divide by 0. There's a spot right there in the middle of the graph where we don't have a value! Now let's investigate a bit more. What if we have x = 2? y = 1/x = ?
@MissLovelyPearlOyster are you going to respond?
sorry my teacher called me, just a minute lemme read all this..
y=1/2? Is that were the curve starts in the graph?
@whpalmer4 ?
yes. if x=2, y = 1/2. how about if x = 1/2?
Idk, other than using a decimal on the bottom hah y=1/0.5?
well, you should know how to divide by a fraction by now! Invert the fraction from the denominator and multiply by it instead: \[\frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}} = 1* \frac{2}{1} = 2\]
how about if x = 1/100, what is y?
y=100?
yep. so, as we get closer and closer to x = 0, y gets bigger and bigger, right?
yes it does..
Okay. what if we have x = -1? y =?
y=-1?
Yep. How about x = -1/2? x = -1/100? what happens as x gets closer and closer to x = 0, but from the negative side?
y=-2, y=-100 ? and y gets smaller?
it goes bigger and bigger, but in the negative direction. |y| increases, right?
yes y gets smaller
i mean bigger hahah
the magnitude of y gets larger...y becomes more and more negative. so on the left side of x = 0, y -> -infinity as we approach x = 0, and on the right side of x = 0, y -> + infinity as we approach x = 0
okay..
and that's exactly what the graph shows, of course. at x=0, y has to be in an infinite number of places at once :-) now, because y approaches that line x = 0 ever and ever closer without actually getting there, we call that an asymptote a vertical asymptote in this case
a rational function will have a vertical asymptote wherever the denominator = 0.
our rational function is \[y = \frac{1}{x}\]there is a vertical asymptote at \(x = 0\) because the denominator is 0 there. Clear?
What if we wanted a similar graph, except with a vertical asymptote at \(x = 1\)?
hmm.. I honestly don't understand all you're big words ahaha
do you understand why we have a vertical asymptote at x = 0?
because y doesnt get to that point where x is 0?
as we get closer and closer to x = 0, y gets closer and closer to the line x = 0, and if you tell me just how close you want it, I can tell you a spot where that is true. and it has a discontinuity where x = 0, because at x = 0-a little bit, y is negative, and at x = 0+a little bit, y is positive, and at no point does y ever equal 0. It has to "snap" from positive to negative, or the other way around. We call that a discontinuity, where there isn't a smooth connection.
we get one at any value of \(x\) that makes our denominator = 0.
how could we write a function that has a denominator that = 0 when x = 1?
How about \[y = \frac{1}{x-1}\]?
what is the value of \(x\) that makes the denominator = 0?
Wait a minute, lemme watch a video on this okay? When I come back, lemme see if i can answer you're questions :)
okay. btw, "you're" = "you are", "your" is the possessive, as in "your notebook"
I know, auto correct, I totally messed up that word haha I'm only stupid in math, but a genius in English. Omg this is still confusing me, and I'm not really comprehending what you're saying. Just try and explain the problem
start with reading the book :D
well, let's let it go at this: if we want a vertical asymptote at some value of x, we need to arrange for the denominator to equal 0 when x equals that value where we want the vertical asymptote.
Hahah my text book doesn't really cover this, they cover how to get the graph, not get the equation from the graph
if we want the denominator to equal 0 at x = -2, how about we use \[y = \frac{1}{x+2}\]?
Looks like this:
(ignore the vertical line at x = -2, that's an artifact of the graphing software)
Looks like our graph, except not quite high enough up on the page, right?
yes it does.. where does the x=-2 and y=5 go in the equation? Those are the asymptotes right?
well, they don't really go in the equation — the asymptotes are values that are never touched (in the case of vertical asymptotes), only approached
if we put the \(x=-2\) into our formula: \[y = \frac{1}{x+2} = \frac{1}{-2+2} = \frac{1}{0}\]
Ohh okay, see now this makes a tiny bit of sense
So what does that have to do with the equation?
that's our vertical asymptote.
ohhh because the -2 is the x asymptote, so we would plug that in for x? And it must equal to zero, so the denominator must be x+2 so the -2 crosses it out. Am I right so far?
yes. to put a vertical asymptote at x = a, we need a term in the denominator: \((x-a)\) If we need multiple vertical asymptotes, we have a product in the denominator: \[(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)\]
Remember that \(a,b,c\) may be positive or negative, so there may be + signs in the final equation, not just -.
but we dont need multiple vertical asymtotes right
is the denominator finished? y=1/(x+2) ? what about the top now?
sorry if im rushing you, I have to leave soon and really need this turned in
denominator is finished.
The top/ how would I do that? You're a great teacher btw
I'm still trying to figure out how to get the top and y-intercept...
Okay, I think I have it. We can add 5 to the result of our fraction to shift the graph up by 5, right? \[y = \frac{1}{x+2}+5\]looks like
Now, we need to adjust the sharpness of the "corner" so that the curve goes through the point \((0,7)\) We can do that by putting a value other than 1 in our numerator:
If we make our function \[y = \frac{a}{x+2}+5\]and find the value of \(a\) so that the curve goes through \((0,7)\) we'll be all set. \[7 = \frac{a}{0+2}+5\]\[7 = \frac{a}{2}+5\]\[a=\]
so the numerator is 12?
No. try solving that again.
ohh a=4
Yes. So I believe our function is\[y = \frac{4}{x+2}+5\] It goes through our y-intercept of (0,7): \[y = \frac{4}{0+2}+5 = 2+5 = 7\] and it has the right asymptotes.
We took the graph of \(y = f(x) = \frac{1}{x}\) and converted it to \[y=4f(x+2)+5\]which gives it a vertical stretching by a factor of 4, shifts it up 5, and left 2.
OMG thank you!! I understand this now :) God bless you, and now I have to log off. Have a great day!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!