Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://screencast.com/t/yPOxDocH How is this incorrect?

OpenStudy (mertsj):

you must have substituted incorrectly. No way to tell what you did wrong unless we see your work.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Actually, I think it's because I failed to distribute the "-" for the second input of g(x). Let me see

OpenStudy (anonymous):

My apologies, I seem to have violated a rule by posting the solutions. Could you show or explain to us what steps you've taken first?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That is my work. Let me know if you need clarification

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Awful quality...lol yeesh

OpenStudy (anonymous):

For the portion which says (2x-4)(2x-4), under that does that say 2x^2 -8x -8x +16 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Here is a better quality picture.

OpenStudy (mertsj):

2x(2x)=4x^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Try checking your FOIL again :] just a simple error.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mertsj has pointed it out.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah I'm dumb...I'm awful with exponent rules...thank you for that. :)

OpenStudy (mertsj):

yw. You'll get it now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We all make simple mistakes! Let us know your final solutions and see if the software your class uses will accept that.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I will! Final question, was my constant correct? 6?

OpenStudy (mertsj):

Should be 16+4-6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or would I distribute the negative and get a constant of 14?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, thank you!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Whenever there is a minus sign infront of brackets, imagine a negative one (-1) instead an multiply it into each term inside.

OpenStudy (mertsj):

Could I suggest a simpler solution?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah, says incorrect :c http://screencast.com/t/3ML6ee7wLkxk

OpenStudy (mertsj):

Replace 2x-4 with y and your equation becomes: \[y^2-y-6=0\]

OpenStudy (mertsj):

Could you factor and solve that equation?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm not sure where to start

OpenStudy (mertsj):

factor

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Factor it like you would if those y's were x's.

OpenStudy (mertsj):

(y-3)(y+2)=0

OpenStudy (mertsj):

Now set each factor equal to 0 and solve for y

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you having any difficulties?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So x=3 and 2?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in this case while we still go on Mertsj's method, it would be y = 2, 3. It is important to distinguish that it is y (or any other letter other than x) in this case because we are temporarily letting y = (or represent) 2x-4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now that you have figured out y = 3 and y= -2 you can resub the original function in. Put back what we called y (which is 2x-4) back into the equation. btw: it is 3 and -2 not just 2. I made a typo in the previous reply.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Anyways to continue, 2x-4 = 3 and 2x-4 = -2 is what you should get when you resubstitute back in. Hopefully you understand why we are allowed to resub and call 2x-4 "y" variable. Now solve for x in those two equations.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!