Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

∀x∈R, x²≥0. What is wrong with this proof? Suppose not. Then for every real number x, x² < 0. In particular, plugging in x = 3, we would get 9 < 0, which is clearly false. This contradiction shows that for every number x, x²≥0.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the negation of "for all" is "there exists"

OpenStudy (helder_edwin):

the negation u r using is wrong: \[ \large \neg(\forall x)(P(x))\equiv(\exists x)(\neg P(x)) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ooh nice

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!