Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

You don't need to show me how to do all 4 problems unless you're willing but I'd appreciate it if you at least informed me how to solve the concept of the problems http://awesomescreenshot.com/0d52et4553

OpenStudy (btaylor):

It looks like you're dealing with combinations and permutations. The formula for a permutation (P) is: \[_nP_r= \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}\] The formula for a combination (C) is:\[_nC_r=\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}\] I don't have time to work each one out, but you should be able to plug them into the formulas.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I forgot what the exclamation marks are indicating me to do...

OpenStudy (btaylor):

exclamation marks mean factorial. \[n! = n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)...(2)(1)\] You basically multiply by all whole numbers equal and less to that number. So, 5! is 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1, or 120.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[_{6}P_{3} = \frac{ 720 }{ (6-3)! }\] Sorry to be bothering you but do I have to subtract the values in the denominator before factoring? Or do I factor both numbers and then subtract?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

By chance do any of you 3 know what to do lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Which three are you referring to? ^_^ And of course you have to subtract first before applying factorial, that's what those parentheses are there for, after all :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You and the two other viewers although it's actually you and another now lol... I swear I'm not crazy /.\ and thank you... so.... \[\frac{ 720 }{ 6 } = 120\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm iffy with my symbols btw lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, there's actually no reason to be so dogmatic with formulas. Maths is there for you to provide shortcuts for yourself (creatively and correctly, of course) A quicker way (in my opinion) to evaluate 6P3 is to just multiply from 6 downwards UNTIL you have exactly *3* factors. 6 x 5 x 4 = 120 Simpler, without all that ! stuff :3

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

This works with any such nPr, by the way :3

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Try 9P4 using this formula first... (9 factorial? Unbelievably large :3)....that's if you can... And then try using this shortcut... multiply from 9 downwards UNTIL you have exactly *4* factors.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

9x8x7x6= 3024? o. o

OpenStudy (anonymous):

XD everything related to math makes me URGH unless I get it right on the first time... haven't done so in years unfortunately... But... \[\frac{ 2177280 }{ 90720 }\] I feel like I messed up somewhere terribly e.e

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Oops... I meant \[\Large \frac{9!}{(9-4)!}\] My bad :)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

By the way, just google 9! and stuff...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

xD it's ohtay... ummm \[\frac{ 2177280 }{ 3024 } = 720\] o.o *goes to google it*

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

LOL it's wrong... can you now see just how atrocious it is to try to evaluate large factorials? XD

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

9! is in fact 362880 now (9-4)! is just 5! or 120

OpenStudy (anonymous):

O___O

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, try dividing 362880 by 120 :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

omgeez /.\ ooooh I put it in the calculator wrong, huh? 18144 Did I put the numbers in correctly this time? >-< lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Probably. Try again. 9! divided by 5! Or 362880 divided by 120 You really have to get the correct answer... unless you're keying it in incorrectly.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

362880 / 120 = 3024 o.o Sometimes when i divide I tend to plug in the numerator and the denominator in the incorrect places >.<

OpenStudy (anonymous):

omg please tell meeeeee it's righhht

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I don't HAVE to tell you it's right. You should KNOW it's right, since you got the same answer originally by just doing it the way I do factorials... 9x8x7x6 remember? You got 3024 then, didn't you? ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

DANG IT LOL I can't with this -flips table- You are correct my good...sir/ma'am... lol -facepalm-

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

We're not done yet, we still have the nCr s to worry about. I'm a boy, and for the love of humanity, don't call me 'sir'. It's *TJ* ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

XD Lo siento TJ ... How do you do? And oooh...goodie... /.\ more trauma

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alrighty

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Crud, I made that typo again -_- \[\Large _9P_4 = \frac{9!}{(9-\color{red}4)!}=\frac{9!}{5!}\] Okay?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

XD it's all G... ok o.o

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, let's expand. \[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}\] And actually, a huge chunk of the numerator gets cancelled out...\[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot\color{blue}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}}{\color{blue}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}}\] \[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot\cancel5\cdot\cancel4\cdot\cancel3\cdot\cancel2\cdot\cancel1}{\cancel5\cdot\cancel4\cdot\cancel3\cdot\cancel2\cdot\cancel1}\] Effectively leaving... \[\Large 9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\] As it should be :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oooooh yeaaa I understand o.o

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, to nCr Do you know the formula?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, even if you do know it, I'll post it anyway :) \[\Large _nC_r = \frac{n!}{\color{blue}{r!}\cdot (n-r)!}\] I coloured in blue the difference it has with the formula for nPr Does this look daunting? :)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Oh wait, it was already posted... derp :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not by heart but I can just scroll up lol... it does actually. It really does /.\

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Orrr you can just type it for me xD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Shhhshhshh it's G

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok it looks just a little less complex... just a bit lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay... this isn't intuitive... let's call this n CHOOSE r :) There's a reason for this. What it actually does is count how many ways you can *choose* r items from a set of n different items. Say, you need two lab partners from a set of 5 students. Then the answer is simply 5C2. Feel any better? :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

... I suppose... except I know how great a number this could turn into with bigger outcomes! OMG!

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

That's assuming the 5 students are different of course, hopefully that's a given (the prospect of 5 completely identical students is rather unnerving O.O ) Now then... to business...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

LOL that's... something to think about [x

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okok... *serious face*

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, enough fooling around from me, let's do this...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Let's solve the third item using the formula first, shall we?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

5C2. \[\Large _5C_2 = \frac{5!}{2! \cdot (5-2)!}\] Please solve ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'll gladly ATTEMPT to solve lol... \[_{5}C_{2} = \frac{ 20 }{ 6 }\] >.< oh goodness

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait wait

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Nope.... you should ALWAYS get an integer solution for such problems... because there are counting problems... silly Angel :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OH MY GOODNESS these rules will be the death of me ;-; May I ask... What exactly's an integer solution? Sorry for all of my questions and struggles >.\

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

A whole number? Which 20/6 is most certainly NOT. Try again. ^_^ I know you can do this :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Urghhhh okay... lemme see...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So... In the numerator and the denominator the factors can be cancelled up to 3 which leaves me with \[\frac{ (5)(4) }{ 2! } \] because the 3 was cancelled out... except... the two factored is just 2 and 20/2 = 10 but it doesn't look right to me... did I mess up somewhere >.<

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

10 is correct. That was... exhausting :D

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So... by now, you're probably expecting a sort of shortcut from me or something, much like with nPr... are you? :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Eh... mathematic calculations are so subtle when there's no confidence in understanding the concept of the problem *sigh*... thank you lol... sorries. >.> Are you by chance insinuating something?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

HmHm?? ;b

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Of course. There is a faster way of doing this. Much like with nPr, multiply from 5 downwards UNTIL you have exactly 2 factors. The only difference is, you divide that answer with 1 multiplying UPWARDS until you have exactly two factors. 5x4 divided by 1x2 20/2 10 Voila :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

>.< wait whaaaat

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Where did the 4 come from o.o

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

5 multiplying downward? What number comes directly before 5? -_- ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

4 o.o lmaoooo but...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait so if it was 7C3 it would be 7 x 6 ?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No... because you multiply downwards until you have *3* factors then :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

DANGNABBIT

OpenStudy (anonymous):

May I have one more example?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Of course. Let's finish up 7C3 first, though. That would be 7x6x5 divided by 1x2x3 If I'm not mistaken, that's 35 :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you and mistaken you most certainly are not... T:

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, let's have a look at a more complicated case... Try 9C8 :P

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

This can't be good... by my method, it would seem like you have to multiply from 9 downwards until you have eight factors... right? 9x8x7x6x5x4x3x2 Simply nasty, isn't it? ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

>-> woah dere

OpenStudy (anonymous):

>.< throw a potato at me why don't you lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Well, do you not trust me to make this easy for you? :D Believe it or not, 9C8 is equal to 9C1 Do you see why?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Trust issues LOL ummm... does it have anything to do with the difference between 9 and 8 being 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

WAIT

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes it does :P Think about it, sans all that maths complications. Remember...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

9C8 is how many ways you can CHOOSE 8 items from a set of 9 different items, yes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm confused with all of this item talk lol /.\ When you're doing your little tactic over there lol are you saying that I factor both n and r by the number that's r?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Wait, just bear with me... instead of items, why don't we just say colours? :P If you have 9 colours and you are meant to choose 8, then... does that sound better? I'm trying to make you *feel* them essence here...also, I'm bored :3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ooooh makes sense and lol glad you're bored otherwise I would have been left to fend for myself ;-; I'm a handful smh -puts hands up- I FEEL IT

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, if you are going to choose 8 colours from a set of 9 different colours, it's as if you're just choosing WHICH ONE you're NOT going to choose, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

o.o I suppose...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

That's why, the number of ways to choose 8 colours from a set of 9 is exactly the same as the number of ways to choose *one* colour from a set of 9.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Alternatively, say we need to choose 7 colours from a set of 9. Then that'd be the same as choosing which *TWO* colours you'd be leaving out. Hence, the number of ways to choose 7 colours from a set of 9 is exactly the same as the number of ways to choose *two* colours from a set of 9.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Lost? :)

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Try to understand it, though if you simply can't, then just tell me...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

And we'll just move on ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

7 colors from a set of 9 ---> 9 x 7 / 7 x 6 Shoot idk... We can move on /.\

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Nope... Anyway, maybe we should leave that (ehem) beautiful conceptual stuff for when you 've mastered the formulas. Right now, just accept that \[\Large _nC_r = _nC_{n-r}\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

\[\Large _nC_r =\frac{n!}{r!\cdot (n-r)!}\]\[\Large _nC_{n-r} =\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\cdot [n-(n-r)]!}=\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\cdot n!}\] Clearly equal. :P

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Sorry, I'm just typo-prone right now :/

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, with that in mind, back to the problem 9C8 We now know this to be equal to 9C(9-8) = 9C1 right? ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No apologies necessary lol and yesh

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, multiply downwards from 9, until you have exactly 1 factor.... so trivial... just 9, right? divide this by 1, multiplied UPWARDS until you have exactly 1 factor... so... just 1, then :P 9/1 = 9 Problem solved. Now try doing it by formula O.O \[\Large _9C_8 = \frac{\color{blue}{9!}}{\color{red}{8!}\cdot\color{green}{ (9-8)!}}= \frac{\color{blue}{362880}}{\color{red}{40320}\cdot \color{green}{1}}= \color{brown}9\] :P ta-da XD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

headache ;-; ... I think I got you though lol

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

My point. If you want to use the shortcut I described, then you'd want to have as small an r as possible. So... Say, when asked to solve 8C5 Just remember that this is the same as 8C3, and use this <---- instead, since 3 is smaller than 5 and less likely to cause you headaches.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!