You don't need to show me how to do all 4 problems unless you're willing but I'd appreciate it if you at least informed me how to solve the concept of the problems http://awesomescreenshot.com/0d52et4553
It looks like you're dealing with combinations and permutations. The formula for a permutation (P) is: \[_nP_r= \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}\] The formula for a combination (C) is:\[_nC_r=\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}\] I don't have time to work each one out, but you should be able to plug them into the formulas.
I forgot what the exclamation marks are indicating me to do...
exclamation marks mean factorial. \[n! = n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)...(2)(1)\] You basically multiply by all whole numbers equal and less to that number. So, 5! is 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1, or 120.
\[_{6}P_{3} = \frac{ 720 }{ (6-3)! }\] Sorry to be bothering you but do I have to subtract the values in the denominator before factoring? Or do I factor both numbers and then subtract?
By chance do any of you 3 know what to do lol
Which three are you referring to? ^_^ And of course you have to subtract first before applying factorial, that's what those parentheses are there for, after all :)
You and the two other viewers although it's actually you and another now lol... I swear I'm not crazy /.\ and thank you... so.... \[\frac{ 720 }{ 6 } = 120\]
I'm iffy with my symbols btw lol
Well, there's actually no reason to be so dogmatic with formulas. Maths is there for you to provide shortcuts for yourself (creatively and correctly, of course) A quicker way (in my opinion) to evaluate 6P3 is to just multiply from 6 downwards UNTIL you have exactly *3* factors. 6 x 5 x 4 = 120 Simpler, without all that ! stuff :3
This works with any such nPr, by the way :3
Try 9P4 using this formula first... (9 factorial? Unbelievably large :3)....that's if you can... And then try using this shortcut... multiply from 9 downwards UNTIL you have exactly *4* factors.
9x8x7x6= 3024? o. o
XD everything related to math makes me URGH unless I get it right on the first time... haven't done so in years unfortunately... But... \[\frac{ 2177280 }{ 90720 }\] I feel like I messed up somewhere terribly e.e
Oops... I meant \[\Large \frac{9!}{(9-4)!}\] My bad :)
By the way, just google 9! and stuff...
xD it's ohtay... ummm \[\frac{ 2177280 }{ 3024 } = 720\] o.o *goes to google it*
LOL it's wrong... can you now see just how atrocious it is to try to evaluate large factorials? XD
9! is in fact 362880 now (9-4)! is just 5! or 120
O___O
So, try dividing 362880 by 120 :)
omgeez /.\ ooooh I put it in the calculator wrong, huh? 18144 Did I put the numbers in correctly this time? >-< lol
Probably. Try again. 9! divided by 5! Or 362880 divided by 120 You really have to get the correct answer... unless you're keying it in incorrectly.
362880 / 120 = 3024 o.o Sometimes when i divide I tend to plug in the numerator and the denominator in the incorrect places >.<
omg please tell meeeeee it's righhht
I don't HAVE to tell you it's right. You should KNOW it's right, since you got the same answer originally by just doing it the way I do factorials... 9x8x7x6 remember? You got 3024 then, didn't you? ^_^
DANG IT LOL I can't with this -flips table- You are correct my good...sir/ma'am... lol -facepalm-
We're not done yet, we still have the nCr s to worry about. I'm a boy, and for the love of humanity, don't call me 'sir'. It's *TJ* ;)
XD Lo siento TJ ... How do you do? And oooh...goodie... /.\ more trauma
alrighty
Crud, I made that typo again -_- \[\Large _9P_4 = \frac{9!}{(9-\color{red}4)!}=\frac{9!}{5!}\] Okay?
XD it's all G... ok o.o
Now, let's expand. \[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}\] And actually, a huge chunk of the numerator gets cancelled out...\[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot\color{blue}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}}{\color{blue}{5\cdot4\cdot3\cdot2\cdot1}}\] \[\Large =\frac{9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\cdot\cancel5\cdot\cancel4\cdot\cancel3\cdot\cancel2\cdot\cancel1}{\cancel5\cdot\cancel4\cdot\cancel3\cdot\cancel2\cdot\cancel1}\] Effectively leaving... \[\Large 9\cdot8\cdot7\cdot6\] As it should be :P
Oooooh yeaaa I understand o.o
Now, to nCr Do you know the formula?
Well, even if you do know it, I'll post it anyway :) \[\Large _nC_r = \frac{n!}{\color{blue}{r!}\cdot (n-r)!}\] I coloured in blue the difference it has with the formula for nPr Does this look daunting? :)
Oh wait, it was already posted... derp :3
Not by heart but I can just scroll up lol... it does actually. It really does /.\
Orrr you can just type it for me xD
Shhhshhshh it's G
ok it looks just a little less complex... just a bit lol
Okay... this isn't intuitive... let's call this n CHOOSE r :) There's a reason for this. What it actually does is count how many ways you can *choose* r items from a set of n different items. Say, you need two lab partners from a set of 5 students. Then the answer is simply 5C2. Feel any better? :3
... I suppose... except I know how great a number this could turn into with bigger outcomes! OMG!
That's assuming the 5 students are different of course, hopefully that's a given (the prospect of 5 completely identical students is rather unnerving O.O ) Now then... to business...
LOL that's... something to think about [x
Okok... *serious face*
Okay, enough fooling around from me, let's do this...
Let's solve the third item using the formula first, shall we?
5C2. \[\Large _5C_2 = \frac{5!}{2! \cdot (5-2)!}\] Please solve ^_^
I'll gladly ATTEMPT to solve lol... \[_{5}C_{2} = \frac{ 20 }{ 6 }\] >.< oh goodness
wait wait
Nope.... you should ALWAYS get an integer solution for such problems... because there are counting problems... silly Angel :P
OH MY GOODNESS these rules will be the death of me ;-; May I ask... What exactly's an integer solution? Sorry for all of my questions and struggles >.\
A whole number? Which 20/6 is most certainly NOT. Try again. ^_^ I know you can do this :)
Urghhhh okay... lemme see...
So... In the numerator and the denominator the factors can be cancelled up to 3 which leaves me with \[\frac{ (5)(4) }{ 2! } \] because the 3 was cancelled out... except... the two factored is just 2 and 20/2 = 10 but it doesn't look right to me... did I mess up somewhere >.<
10 is correct. That was... exhausting :D
So... by now, you're probably expecting a sort of shortcut from me or something, much like with nPr... are you? :3
Eh... mathematic calculations are so subtle when there's no confidence in understanding the concept of the problem *sigh*... thank you lol... sorries. >.> Are you by chance insinuating something?
HmHm?? ;b
Of course. There is a faster way of doing this. Much like with nPr, multiply from 5 downwards UNTIL you have exactly 2 factors. The only difference is, you divide that answer with 1 multiplying UPWARDS until you have exactly two factors. 5x4 divided by 1x2 20/2 10 Voila :P
>.< wait whaaaat
Where did the 4 come from o.o
5 multiplying downward? What number comes directly before 5? -_- ;)
4 o.o lmaoooo but...
wait so if it was 7C3 it would be 7 x 6 ?
No... because you multiply downwards until you have *3* factors then :P
DANGNABBIT
May I have one more example?
Of course. Let's finish up 7C3 first, though. That would be 7x6x5 divided by 1x2x3 If I'm not mistaken, that's 35 :P
Thank you and mistaken you most certainly are not... T:
Now, let's have a look at a more complicated case... Try 9C8 :P
This can't be good... by my method, it would seem like you have to multiply from 9 downwards until you have eight factors... right? 9x8x7x6x5x4x3x2 Simply nasty, isn't it? ;)
>-> woah dere
>.< throw a potato at me why don't you lol
Well, do you not trust me to make this easy for you? :D Believe it or not, 9C8 is equal to 9C1 Do you see why?
Trust issues LOL ummm... does it have anything to do with the difference between 9 and 8 being 1
WAIT
Yes it does :P Think about it, sans all that maths complications. Remember...
9C8 is how many ways you can CHOOSE 8 items from a set of 9 different items, yes?
I'm confused with all of this item talk lol /.\ When you're doing your little tactic over there lol are you saying that I factor both n and r by the number that's r?
Wait, just bear with me... instead of items, why don't we just say colours? :P If you have 9 colours and you are meant to choose 8, then... does that sound better? I'm trying to make you *feel* them essence here...also, I'm bored :3
Ooooh makes sense and lol glad you're bored otherwise I would have been left to fend for myself ;-; I'm a handful smh -puts hands up- I FEEL IT
Now, if you are going to choose 8 colours from a set of 9 different colours, it's as if you're just choosing WHICH ONE you're NOT going to choose, right?
o.o I suppose...
That's why, the number of ways to choose 8 colours from a set of 9 is exactly the same as the number of ways to choose *one* colour from a set of 9.
Alternatively, say we need to choose 7 colours from a set of 9. Then that'd be the same as choosing which *TWO* colours you'd be leaving out. Hence, the number of ways to choose 7 colours from a set of 9 is exactly the same as the number of ways to choose *two* colours from a set of 9.
Lost? :)
Try to understand it, though if you simply can't, then just tell me...
And we'll just move on ^_^
7 colors from a set of 9 ---> 9 x 7 / 7 x 6 Shoot idk... We can move on /.\
Nope... Anyway, maybe we should leave that (ehem) beautiful conceptual stuff for when you 've mastered the formulas. Right now, just accept that \[\Large _nC_r = _nC_{n-r}\]
\[\Large _nC_r =\frac{n!}{r!\cdot (n-r)!}\]\[\Large _nC_{n-r} =\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\cdot [n-(n-r)]!}=\frac{n!}{(n-r)!\cdot n!}\] Clearly equal. :P
Sorry, I'm just typo-prone right now :/
So, with that in mind, back to the problem 9C8 We now know this to be equal to 9C(9-8) = 9C1 right? ^_^
No apologies necessary lol and yesh
So, multiply downwards from 9, until you have exactly 1 factor.... so trivial... just 9, right? divide this by 1, multiplied UPWARDS until you have exactly 1 factor... so... just 1, then :P 9/1 = 9 Problem solved. Now try doing it by formula O.O \[\Large _9C_8 = \frac{\color{blue}{9!}}{\color{red}{8!}\cdot\color{green}{ (9-8)!}}= \frac{\color{blue}{362880}}{\color{red}{40320}\cdot \color{green}{1}}= \color{brown}9\] :P ta-da XD
headache ;-; ... I think I got you though lol
My point. If you want to use the shortcut I described, then you'd want to have as small an r as possible. So... Say, when asked to solve 8C5 Just remember that this is the same as 8C3, and use this <---- instead, since 3 is smaller than 5 and less likely to cause you headaches.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!