Question

How can the text often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb best be interpreted?

If you cut off one bad part, you run the risk of killing the entire body.

It is never wise to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.

It is often necessary to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.

It is often necessary to let an entire body die rather than cutting off a limb.

Answer 1

"often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb"

Answer 2

A or B is My guess

Answer 3

c

Answer 4

There is a proverb from the bible

Answer 5

it goes like this:

Answer 6

A proverb from the bible that relates to a quote by Abraham Lincoln?

Answer 7

If your eye is causing you to sin, rip it out. For it is better to save the whole.

Answer 8

If you hand does the same, cut it off, for it is better to save the whole.

Answer 9

I feel like this relates to that.

Answer 10

Maybe, I could see why C would be correct

Answer 11

It is often necessary to get rid of one bad part to save the larger whole.

Answer 12

"but a life is never wisely given to save a limb"
this part throws me off

Answer 13

people seem to throw away life.

Answer 14

it doesent seem to matter to them that much

Answer 15

during the civil war, they were throwing away the lives of the slaves.

Answer 16

they did not seem to care about what happened to them both spiritually and physically.

Answer 17

It is smart to help one person in need, and to also save the rest.

Answer 18

For that person whom you saved, may help others.

Answer 19

does that make sense?

Answer 20

Yeah I gotcha

Answer 21

C it is! Thanks for the help :)

Answer 22

jʊr welkəm!