Which is a counterexample that disproves the conjecture? For all real numbers n, 2^n ≥ 1. A. n = 0 B. n = 0.5 C. n = –1 D. n = 3
With A you get 1 With B you get 2^(0.5) which is more than 1 With C you get 2^-1 = 1/2 ---> ANSWER With D you get 8
Ah, I see. Thanks!
You welcome :)
How about this one? Choose the counterexample that disproves the conjecture. If n is a two-digit prime number, then the two digits must be different. A. n = 22 B. n = 17 C. n = 11 D. n = 10 Explanation as well?
n, _ _ A, has the same digits but not prime, because 22 has also factors such as 2 and 11. B is prime, but not same digits. C same digits and prime . (YOUR ANSWER) D not same digits, and not prime.
Not C.
I misread the question.
Ya, its not C
B, because it's the only number with 2 different digits that's prime.
Thought so! Thanks again :)
np
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!