Question

Much has been said of the impropriety of representing slaves. But representation and taxation go together. Would it be just to impose a burden, without giving an advantage?

Read the quotation. To which issue is this quotation related?

The formation of the Electoral College

The Great Compromise

The question of state vs. federal power

The Three-Fifths Compromise

Answer 1

@Kealii808

Answer 2

give me a sec

Answer 3

Wut, why? Wut are you doing, this is a hurry :/

Answer 4

The Three-Fifths Compromise

Answer 5

I think it's the Three-Fifths Compromise.. That's 'D'.
The compromise stated that three of every five slaves would be counted towards an extra representative in Congress.. It looks like this is an argument going against the Compromise.

Answer 6

I'm sure

Answer 7

What? what's the answer

Answer 8

D

Answer 9

Which amendment protects citizens' freedoms of speech and press?

First

Third

Fifth

Seventh

Answer 10

Nvm, it's first.

Answer 11

yup

Answer 12

any more

Answer 13

Which constitutional idea gave large states an advantage?

Connecticut Compromise

Maryland Compromise

New Jersey Plan

Virginia Plan

Answer 14

Oh, it's D.

Answer 15

yeah

Answer 16

The Bill of Rights promises that punishment for a crime cannot be cruel or unusual, meaning that it cannot be painful or degrading to the person's dignity. What punishment would be considered cruel and unusual?

Someone who commits assault is beaten as punishment.

Someone caught shoplifting is made to pay a fine and write an apology.

Someone caught driving while drunk is punished by revoking driving privileges.

Someone caught littering is punished by being made to pick up trash on the highway.

Answer 17

a

Answer 18

Which was a result of the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise?

Congress could end slavery at any time.

Southern crops could not be sold abroad.

There could be no taxes on Southern exports.

The slave trade would end with ratification.

Answer 19

IDK sorry

Answer 20

The Federalists argued that the economy was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. Which can you infer was part of their argument?

Allowing the states to print their own money would make the national economy stronger.

The states should be able to print their own money because it would give them more power.

Since the states printed their own money, trade between the states was almost impossible.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had more money than the states.

Answer 21

Dude post it on the board

Answer 22

k

Answer 23

Or what ever it is called