Explain why Rolle's Theorem does not apply to the function even though there exist a and b such that f(a) = f(b). (Select all that apply.) √[(2-x^(2/3)]^3 [-1,1] 1. None of these. 2. f(a) does not equal f(b) for all possible values of a and b in the interval [π, 3π]. 3. There are points on the interval [a, b] where f is not continuous. 4. f '(a) does not equal f '(b) for any values in the interval [π, 3π]. 5. There are points on the interval (a, b) where f is not differentiable.
Do you remember what conditions you need to have before you can apply Rolle's theorem?
I've never used Rolle's Theorem but I think there are 4 conditions
There's usually only three conditions. Rolle's theorem says that "if a real-valued function f is continuous on a closed interval [a, b], differentiable on the open interval (a, b), and f(a) = f(b), then there exists a c in the open interval (a, b) such that f'(c)=0." So the three conditions are 1. Continuous on the closed interval [a,b] 2. Differentiable on the open interval (a,b) 3. f(a)=f(b). Let's go through these one by one. First, is your function continuous on the interval [-1,1]?
yes
Good. Let's skip to the other easy property to check. Does f(-1)=f(1)?
no
I got √27
Just to make sure I'm thinking of the function correctly, the function is\[\Large\sqrt{(2-x^{2/3})^3}\]correct?
right
If we put \(x=1\) into the function, we get\[\Large\sqrt{(2-1^{2/3})^3}=\sqrt{(2-1)^3}=1\]If we put \(x=-1\), we get\[\Large\sqrt{(2-(-1)^{2/3})^3}=\sqrt{(2-1^{1/3})^3}=\sqrt{(2-1)^3}=1\]So they are equal.
ok
does that satisfy #3?
f(1)=1
Sorry for the delay, but yes. That means the functions satisfies the third condition. Now we just have to see if it's differentiable. Can you tell me what the derivative is?
√[2-x^(2/3)] ------------ 3√x
- 4 ------------- [27√2-x^(8/27)] (x^(19/27)
The first one looked right to me. So using the first one, can you tell me where the derivative isn't defined?
at 0
Right. And 0 is inside the interval (-1,1). Therefore, the function is not differentiable on the interval (-1,1), and so it doesn't satisfy the second condition. And that means we can't use Rolle's theorem.
ok
choice 5 then
thanks
You're welcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!