The energy of a particular color of green light is 3.70E-22 kJ. The wavelength of this light is nanometers. (109 nm = 1 m)
so i first converted kj to k...3.70e-22kj*(1/1j)=3.70e-22k.....then.....3.70e-22k*(1000m/1k)=3.7e-19m...then....3.7e-19m*(10^9nm/1m)=3.7e-10
what did i do wrong???
I'm not sure I follow the conversions you are trying to do here. kJ is kiloJoules, where kilo is just a prefix. Converting from kJ to k does not seem to make sense. We ought to convert from kJ to J and then apply a formula between Eenrgy and wavelength to solve for wavelength. Then convert wavelength from meters to nanometers...
oh so i have to use E=hv
Yes. Although v is frequency I believe, so we need just one more: c = (Lambda) v (c the speed of light, Lambda is wavelength, and v is frequency. This lets us convert between frequency and wavelength. Or the cumulative formula is just E = (h c)/ (Lambda)
\( c = \lambda v \) \(E = h v = \dfrac{h c}{\lambda} \)
okay hold on im going to work it out
so i converted kj to j and i got 3.7e-19j would this be v or λ, we know that c=2.9979x10^8m/c
that would be energy: "The energy of a particular color of green light is..." So that goes in for E. We want to find Wavelength, which is lambda. One way is by finding frequency v and then using the c = lambda * v formula to switch. Otherwise, we can just use this formula and find lambda directly.: E = hc / (lambda)
but we dont have λ
Lambda is what we want to find, yes? That is wavelength, which the problem is asking for. h and c are just constants. And we have E given in the problem. Lambda is the only variable in the equation, so we can solve for it. :)
okay v=5.36e-7?
λ=5.59e14
is this right
Hm.. 5.36 * 10^(-7) looks like the value for lambda I got. \( E = \dfrac{hc}{\lambda} \) \( 3.7 10^{-19} = \dfrac{(6.626*10^{-34}) (2.9979*10^8)}{\lambda} \)
3.7 * 10^(-19) , not 3.710.
wait i used \[\frac{ hc }{ v }\]
If you solve here: \( 3.7 * 10^{-19} = (6.626 * 10^{-34} ) \nu \) \( \nu = \dfrac{3.7 *10^{-19}}{6.626 * 10^{-34}} \) comes out to 5.58 * 10^(14). I think you just reversed their roles.
thats how i got v=5.36e-7
Yes; you effectively already had lambda, just switch v for lambda really. Then that would be wavelength in meters. Convert it to nanometers for the final answer. :)
so you did E=hv....so when they give you E=hv=hc/v (they are 2 differeny equations not have to be used together?
Hmm... The original equation that I am looking at is this: \( E = h \nu \) \(E\) is energy in Joules, \(h\) is Planck constant in Joule-seconds. \( \nu \) is frequency in cycles per second. \( c = \lambda \nu \) \( \nu = \dfrac{c}{\lambda} \) This separate equation relates wavelength \(\lambda\) (meters) and frequency \(\nu \) to the speed of light. Substitution \( \nu = \dfrac{c}{\lambda} \) into the first equation, we have: \( E = h \dfrac{c}{\lambda} \) The usefulness of either equation is based on whether you have/need wavelength or frequency. In this case, we need wavelength, so we use the second equation. What I said previously is that technically, you *can* use the first one and find frequency, but you need to then convert to wavelength using the middle equation.
oh okay that makes much more sense...wow thank you so much!
Glad to help! :) Were you able to find the answer? I am coming up with about 530 nm, which checks out according to the visible light spectrum.
im doing it hold on
λ=5.37e-7....i got 537
Yep, sounds good to me. :)
its rights!!! yess thank you... could i ask you another question in a couple of mins?
I may have to sleep very soon (it's late here, 12am). I'll see what I can do. :)
thank you...let me know then i could ask you tom
Is it a similar question to this one?
yup
Should be fine now then? That shouldn't take too long.
okay ill let you
what are the units for frequency?
A local FM radio station broadcasts at an energy of 6.52E-29 kJ/photon. Calculate the frequency at which it is broadcasting. Frequency = MHz (1 MHz = 106 sec -1) i got 3.03e-6 MHz
What was your process to obtain that answer?
i converted kj to j.....\[\frac{ 6.52e-29kj }{photon }*\frac{ 1000j }{ ?1kj }=6.52e-26 j/photon\] then \[6.52e-26=\frac{ 6.626e-34*2.9979e8 }{ v }\] then \[v=\frac{ 1.98e-25 }{ 6.52e-26 }\] ....v=3.036809816
with 3.036809816/10^6=3.03e-6MHz
I believe this is the same error from earlier... in that equation, v is in place of where wavelength is. \( E = \dfrac{h c}{\color{blue}\lambda} \) This is the equation with wavelength. \( E = h \color{red}{\nu} \) This is the equation with frequency.
okay i got 98
98 MHz looks good to me now. It seems once you have the correct equation, you do fine with the math work. :)
thank you so much for explaining it to me i was so confused before...
Yep, glad to help again. :D I will be heading off to bed now if that is all. Best of luck and gnight!
good night...hope to talk to you again!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!