quick question see attached
\[h=139-125\cos\frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\] where h is given in feet and t is given in minutes - use this equation to find the times at which the passengers will be 100 ft above the ground got to this point and stuck \[\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10}t=0.312\]
@jdoe0001 @whpalmer4 @robtobey
h=139+Cos[\[Pi] 10 t] ?
i have solutions book and its saying \[\frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t=1.233+2\pi k \] or \[\frac{ \pi }{ 10}t=(2\pi-1.253)+2\pi k\] where does this come from ?
i set original equation to \[100=139-125\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\] then got to \[\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t=0.312\] now what ?
@e.mccormick
t is not yet alone.
And is it \(\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\) or \(\cos \left(\frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\right)\)?
first one
OK. Then what is \(\dfrac{0.312}{\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }}\) ?
is it:\[\cos(\frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t)\] or:\[\cos(\frac{ \pi }{ 10 })t\]
I already asked that.
but did he understand it as that
or she
i just dont understand how they got to \[\frac{ \pi }{ 10}t=1.253+2\pi k\] or \[\frac{ \pi }{ 10}t=(2\pi-1.253)+2\pi k \] is in solutions book how do u get to that point its as i have it written in original no ( )
2pik means it is + a multiple of 2pi
because cosine has a period of 2pi
Refer to the Mathematica attachment.
ok yes i know that but how do i get from \[\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t=0.312 \]
answer is saying 4.0 minutes and 16.0 minutes i just want to know how to get that point in previous post :/
\(100=139-125\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\) \(-39=-125\cos \frac{ \pi }{ 10 }t\) The reason we keep asking is simple. If it is: \(\cos \left(\dfrac{ \pi }{ 10 }\right) t\) Then it is a basic calculation and only at one point. On the other hand, if it is: \(\cos \left(\dfrac{ \pi }{ 10 }t \right) \) then it means: \(\cos \left(\dfrac{ t\pi }{ 10 } \right) \) And you have to isolate things a completely different way. It just looks odd for them to have put the t at the end like that. And what Rob did, \(\cos \left(10\pi t \right) \) is also possible, and makes sense for changing how it was written into something that looks like it maight have been done in a book. Something is simply wrong in how it was written.
ok so even if that how do i get to the point where it is no cos just to the point in previous post
going to post the picture of what i have for solution manual
does this help? lol
It looks like they took the arccos of both sides.
ohhh ok that helps haha!! that was what i was confused at how they got lol!!
\(\arccos(.312) \approx 1.25349894 \) in radians
yes ok makes sense!!
And the rest is to deal with it being periodic.
|dw:1398388197035:dw|
With this being the cosine, it would be the x value that is critical.
thanks :D got it was just not sure how do get the other parts thanks !!
Kk. Have fun!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!