Find this difficult :/
@mathmale @eliassaab @Nurali @cwrw238 @Compassionate @Vincent-Lyon.Fr @theEric
help needed only fr the third part :)
@ParthKohli @AccessDenied
So what have you attempted so far? Have you already applied the aforementioned perpendicular distance formulas and found the distances?
What I had done first was use the parameter lambda (I labelled it p because it is easier to type): r = (1+2p)i + (1+p)j + (2p-1)k and directly applied the perpendicular distance formula given to each plane. They are equal, so you simply have to solve for the parameter p in the end... and make sure to take care of the absolute values by using both positive and negative cases.
which one did u equate it to?
The perpendicular distance between point r = (1+2p) i + (1+p) j + (2p-1) k and the plane x + 2y - 2z = 1 equals The perpendicular distance between point r = (1+2p) i + (1+p) j + (2p-1) k and the plane 2x - 2y + z = 7.
And solve for P u get two answers ? then find distance for each P
Yep. The absolute values will give you two answers. And then once you find p for each, you just plug them back into your original line r = (1+2p) i + (1+p) j + (2p-1) k because that gives you the two position vectors of the points. Take their distance to get the final answer. :)
according to the given formula, to which one shuld i plug in the lambda equation?
The lambda equation is the position vector x_1 i + y_1 j + z_1 k Your plane is ax + by + cz = d Here is an example for how I set up the first one: TO x + 2y - 2z = 1 distance = | a*x_1 + b*y_1 + c*z_1 - d | / sqrt(a^2 + b^2 + c^2) distance = |(1+2p) + 2(1+p) + -2(2p-1) - 1|/sqrt(1^2+2^2+2^2) and then simplify like terms.
thanks il do it and let u know
there is only one value for lambda o.O
What was the value of lambda?
5/2
Hm.. when you simplify that first perpendicular distance down: |1+2p + 2+2p - 4p+2 - 1| / sqrt(9) |2p+2p-4p +1+2+2-1|/3 |0 + 4|/3 = 4/3 You got this one?
yes
sorry lambda = 3
Yup, that is one value. Did you get |-8+4p|/3 for the second?
I mean for the second distance, not second lambda **
Because those absolute values must be kept there to solve this equation: |-8+4p| / 3 = 4 / 3 <==> |-8 + 4p| = 4 There are two cases, either the inside is positive or negative 4, because then the absolute value of +-4 = 4
which means lambda is either positibe or negative
Well we split it into two cases of the argument, the argument involving lambda has to be positive or negative 4 although not necessarily lambda itself: -8 + 4p = 4 OR -8 + 4p = -4 Because if the argument equals + or - 4, the absolute value of the whole argument equals 4.
oh okay got that part...thanks yeah :)
appreciate ur help :)
You're welcome! Always glad to help. :)
Then the last thing to do after that is simply substitute each value of lambda into the original position vector: r = (1+2p)i + (1+p)j + (2p-1)k p=1, 3 and find their distance by the regular distance formula sqrt((x_2-x_1)^2 + (y_2-y_1)^2 + (z_2-z_1)^2). :D
yeah :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!