Mapping,having difficulty understanding the proof
Canada is north ... :)
What do you mean ?should I translate them into English
you should ask a question that can be answered, or responded to that doesnt involve mind reading ....
I don't understand the blue lines part proof,why there is a "so" ,especially,why x belong to A can lead to f(x)belong to f(A)
you do realize that we cant see what it is that you are looking at and that you need to actually provide us with that context.
in general, if x is an element of A, and f maps the elements of A to an image of A, f[A]; then f maps x to f(x) if x is in the usable domain of A
Really ? You can't? I added a attachment,a picture?
I don't really understand ""the image of A"you talked about ,they are sets,I think it is quite natural if x is an element of set A,then f(x) belongs to f(A)
no files are showing up as attached on my end.
and just becuase x is in A, does not mean that it is in the domain of the function.
take the function sqrt(x) if A is the set of real numbers, then the set of negative real numbers is not in the domain of sqrt(x)
|dw:1398866792141:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!